Every vote on this decision
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
260 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published., where every MEP’s position is recorded.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 80 amendments (3 adopted, 77 rejected) and 179 parts of the text voted on separately (147 adopted, 32 rejected).
A proposed change to the text, voted on before the final vote. · 80
80 amendment votes: 3 adopted, 77 rejected
-
Vote 1:Amendment 24, adding text before paragraph 1
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Before § 1 – Am 24
Rejected 140 for, 478 against, 8 abstained
13:17Roll call requested by The Left, ECR
-
Vote 2:Amendment 63, adding text before paragraph 1
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Before § 1 – Am 63
Rejected 128 for, 482 against, 14 abstained
13:17Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 6:Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 3
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 3 – Am 64
Rejected 133 for, 476 against, 21 abstained
13:19Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 7:Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 3
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 3 – Am 65
Rejected 122 for, 484 against, 20 abstained
13:19Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 8:Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 3
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 3 – Am 66
Rejected 127 for, 476 against, 26 abstained
13:19Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 9:Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 3
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 3 – Am 67
Rejected 128 for, 471 against, 27 abstained
13:20Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 15:Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 4
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 4 – Am 15
Rejected 92 for, 491 against, 43 abstained
13:20Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 16:Amendment 96, adding text after paragraph 4
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 4 – Am 96
Rejected 177 for, 431 against, 10 abstained
13:21Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 17:Amendment 97, adding text after paragraph 4
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 4 – Am 97
Rejected 173 for, 423 against, 22 abstained
13:21Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 18:Amendment 98, adding text after paragraph 4
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 4 – Am 98
Rejected 155 for, 431 against, 34 abstained
13:21Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 19:Amendment 99, adding text after paragraph 4
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 4 – Am 99
Rejected 193 for, 419 against, 7 abstained
13:21Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 21:Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 10
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 10 – Am 25
Rejected 97 for, 494 against, 29 abstained
13:21Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 37:Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 13
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 13 – Am 68
Rejected 127 for, 486 against, 10 abstained
13:24Roll call requested by ECR, Greens
-
Vote 38:Amendment 83, adding text after paragraph 13
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 13 – Am 83
Rejected 127 for, 482 against, 13 abstained
13:24Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 39:Amendment 69 to paragraph 14
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 14 – Am 69
Rejected 119 for, 483 against, 18 abstained
13:25Roll call requested by EPP, Greens
-
Vote 40:Amendment 26 to paragraph 15
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 15 – Am 26
Rejected 123 for, 486 against, 13 abstained
13:25Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 41:Amendment 27 to paragraph 16
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16 – Am 27
Rejected 131 for, 483 against, 10 abstained
13:25Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 55:Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 1
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 58/1
Rejected 199 for, 402 against, 20 abstained
13:27Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN
‘Demands the immediate repeal of Directive (EU) 2023/959, which introduces the emissions trading system (ETS 2) covering the building sector,’
-
Vote 56:Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 58/2
Rejected 193 for, 404 against, 24 abstained
13:28Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN
The part voted on
‘considering that it functions as an anti-social and economically harmful de facto tax on heating; points out that including homes in emissions trading will lead to a rapid increase in housing costs, hitting low-income families hardest; opposes the ideological inflation of energy prices, which undermines the competitiveness of the European construction sector and pushes millions of citizens toward energy poverty;’
-
Vote 57:Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 20
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 70
Rejected 118 for, 492 against, 11 abstained
13:28Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 58:Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 20
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 71
Rejected 117 for, 498 against, 7 abstained
13:28Roll call requested by ECR, Greens
-
Vote 59:Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 20
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 72
Rejected 111 for, 494 against, 18 abstained
13:28Roll call requested by ECR, Greens
-
Vote 60:Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 20
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 73
Rejected 119 for, 485 against, 13 abstained
13:29Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 61:Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 20
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 20 – Am 74
Rejected 103 for, 488 against, 28 abstained
13:29Roll call requested by EPP, Greens
-
Vote 62:Amendment 59 to paragraph 21 — part 1
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21 – Am 59/1
Rejected 189 for, 405 against, 28 abstained
13:29Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN
‘Calls for the complete repeal of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive1a (EPBD),’
-
Vote 63:Amendment 59 to paragraph 21 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21 – Am 59/2
Rejected 189 for, 400 against, 23 abstained
13:29Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN
The part voted on
‘which, through mandatory renovations, imposes unrealistic financial burdens on homeowners ranging from EUR 15 000 to EUR 100 000 per building; stresses that mandating the zero-emission building standard drastically increases construction costs and discourages new investment, which is extremely irresponsible in the face of the housing crisis; maintains that owners and the free market must determine the pace of property modernisation;’
-
Vote 70:Amendment 28 to paragraph 22
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 22 – Am 28
Rejected 121 for, 476 against, 24 abstained
13:31Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 77:Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 22
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 22 – Am 29
Rejected 77 for, 523 against, 24 abstained
13:32Roll call requested by The Left, ECR
-
Vote 78:Amendment 30 to paragraph 23
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 23 – Am 30
Rejected 120 for, 472 against, 26 abstained
13:32Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 83:Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 24
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 24 – Am 31
Rejected 98 for, 513 against, 8 abstained
13:33Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 84:Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 25
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 25 – Am 75
Rejected 139 for, 448 against, 36 abstained
13:34Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 85:Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 26
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 26 – Am 76
Rejected 114 for, 482 against, 21 abstained
13:34Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 86:Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 27
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 27 – Am 77
Rejected 135 for, 479 against, 5 abstained
13:34Roll call requested by EPP, Greens
-
Vote 87:Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 27
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 27 – Am 78
Rejected 106 for, 486 against, 27 abstained
13:34Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 88:Amendment 32 to paragraph 28
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 28 – Am 32
Rejected 91 for, 506 against, 23 abstained
13:34Roll call requested by The Left, EPP
-
Vote 90:Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 28
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 28 – Am 79
Rejected 137 for, 478 against, 12 abstained
13:35Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 91:Amendment 80, adding text after paragraph 28
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 28 – Am 80
Rejected 153 for, 432 against, 27 abstained
13:35Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 93:Amendment 33 to paragraph 29
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 29 – Am 33
Rejected 127 for, 487 against, 13 abstained
13:36Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 97:Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 29
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 29 – Am 34
Rejected 108 for, 484 against, 32 abstained
13:36Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 98:Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 29
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 29 – Am 35
Rejected 102 for, 497 against, 18 abstained
13:37Roll call requested by The Left, ECR
-
Vote 99:Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 29
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 29 – Am 36
Rejected 120 for, 459 against, 40 abstained
13:37Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 100:Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 29
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 29 – Am 37
Rejected 105 for, 501 against, 20 abstained
13:37Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 101:Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 29
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 29 – Am 38
Rejected 107 for, 488 against, 24 abstained
13:37Roll call requested by The Left, ECR
-
Vote 117:Amendment 39 to paragraph 35
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 35 – Am 39
Rejected 123 for, 476 against, 2 abstained
13:40Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 123:Amendment 40 to paragraph 36
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 36 – Am 40
Rejected 279 for, 305 against, 43 abstained
13:40Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 128:Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 37
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 37 – Am 41
Rejected 119 for, 484 against, 26 abstained
13:41Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 129:Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 37
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 37 – Am 42
Rejected 91 for, 506 against, 23 abstained
13:41Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 130:Amendment 81 to paragraph 39
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 39 – Am 81
Rejected 128 for, 477 against, 20 abstained
13:42Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 131:Amendment 43 to paragraph 39
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 39 – Am 43
Rejected 91 for, 483 against, 48 abstained
13:42Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 133:Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 39
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 39 – Am 44
Rejected 139 for, 455 against, 27 abstained
13:42Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 135:Amendment 82 to paragraph 40
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 40 – Am 82
Rejected 142 for, 461 against, 24 abstained
13:43Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 140:Amendment 46 to paragraph 41
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 41 – Am 46
Rejected 99 for, 516 against, 12 abstained
13:43Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 149:Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 41
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 41 – Am 47
Rejected 114 for, 494 against, 20 abstained
13:44Roll call requested by The Left, ECR
-
Vote 150:Amendment 48, adding text after paragraph 41
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 41 – Am 48
Rejected 115 for, 485 against, 18 abstained
13:45Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 154:Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 42
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 42 – Am 16
Rejected 71 for, 507 against, 46 abstained
13:45Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 155:Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 42
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 42 – Am 17
Rejected 126 for, 474 against, 22 abstained
13:46Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 156:Amendment 84 to paragraph 43
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 43 – Am 84
Rejected 120 for, 480 against, 24 abstained
13:46Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 157:Amendment 49 to paragraph 43
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 43 – Am 49
Rejected 137 for, 458 against, 22 abstained
13:46Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 164:Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 45
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 45 – Am 18
Rejected 150 for, 446 against, 21 abstained
13:47Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 168:Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 46
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 46 – Am 19
Rejected 147 for, 466 against, 10 abstained
13:48Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 172:Amendment 51 to paragraph 48
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48 – Am 51
Rejected 105 for, 494 against, 18 abstained
13:48Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 183:Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 48
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 48 – Am 20
Rejected 127 for, 493 against, 4 abstained
13:51Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 184:Amendment 85, adding text after paragraph 48
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 48 – Am 85
Rejected 154 for, 438 against, 25 abstained
13:51Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 185:Amendment 86, adding text after paragraph 48
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 48 – Am 86
Rejected 147 for, 445 against, 23 abstained
13:51Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 189:Amendment 105, adding text after paragraph 49
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 49 – Am 105
Adopted 405 for, 154 against, 62 abstained
13:52Roll call requested by EPP
-
Vote 190:Amendment 106, adding text after paragraph 50 — part 1
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 50 – Am 106/1
Adopted 529 for, 72 against, 19 abstained
13:52Roll call requested by EPP, S&D · split vote by ECR
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘reiterates, in this context, its call for a substantial dedicated budget of at least EUR 20 billion for the European Child Guarantee;’
-
Vote 191:Amendment 106, adding text after paragraph 50 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 50 – Am 106/2
Adopted 323 for, 247 against, 41 abstained
13:52Roll call requested by EPP, S&D · split vote by ECR
those words
-
Vote 192:Amendment 87 to paragraph 52
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 52 – Am 87
Rejected 106 for, 489 against, 18 abstained
13:52Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 193:Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 52
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 52 – Am 53
Rejected 127 for, 472 against, 17 abstained
13:53Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 194:Amendment 61 to paragraph 53
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 53 – Am 61
Rejected 281 for, 306 against, 31 abstained
13:53Roll call requested by EPP
-
Vote 198:Amendment 54 to paragraph 55
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 55 – Am 54
Rejected 150 for, 438 against, 33 abstained
13:53Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 199:Amendment 60 to paragraph 55
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 55 – Am 60
Rejected 99 for, 505 against, 17 abstained
13:54Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 202:Amendment 55 to paragraph 57
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 57 – Am 55
Rejected 125 for, 485 against, 8 abstained
13:54Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 205:Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 57
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 57 – Am 56
Rejected 111 for, 491 against, 18 abstained
13:55Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 214:Amendment 88, adding text after recital D
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After recital D – Am 88
Rejected 193 for, 412 against, 18 abstained
13:56Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 215:Amendment 7, adding text after recital F
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After recital F – Am 7
Rejected 106 for, 511 against, 6 abstained
13:56Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 217:Amendment 90, adding text after recital H
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After recital H – Am 90
Rejected 178 for, 430 against, 10 abstained
13:56Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 226:Amendment 62 to recital O
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital O – Am 62
Rejected 132 for, 472 against, 14 abstained
13:58Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 230:Amendment 92, adding text after recital O
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After recital O – Am 92
Rejected 170 for, 441 against, 10 abstained
13:58Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 239:Amendment 23, adding text after recital S
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After recital S – Am 23
Rejected 132 for, 472 against, 12 abstained
14:00Roll call requested by ECR
A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. · 179
179 votes on parts of the text: 147 adopted, 32 rejected
-
Vote 3:Paragraph 3 — part 1
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 3/1
Adopted 468 for, 123 against, 34 abstained
13:19Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
‘Strongly welcomes the Commission’s commitment to deliver and implement an ambitious European Affordable Housing Plan;’
-
Vote 4:Paragraph 3 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
‘Strongly welcomes the Commission’s commitment to deliver and implement an ambitious European Affordable Housing Plan;’
-
Vote 5:Paragraph 3 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
‘recalls that the Affordable Housing Plan must respect the principle of subsidiarity, taking into account the specific needs of each Member State;’
-
Vote 10:Paragraph 4 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘Calls on the Commission to duly take into account Parliament’s position on the housing crisis; calls on the Commission to convene the first EU housing summit focused on concrete solutions; stresses that the European Affordable Housing Plan should prioritise actions to increase genuine affordability, and support Member States in delivering decent, sustainable and affordable homes for millions of Europeans; points out that housing is a Member State competence, but acknowledges that sectoral EU legislation may have an impact on the overall viability and costliness of building and on the renovation and repurposing of houses;’ ‘points out that housing is a Member State competence’ and ‘insists that there are EU initiatives that can bring about real added value to addressing the housing crisis, not least by tapping into the full potential of the single market in the construction sector, enabling greater investment via the use of EU funds, raising the standards of the quality of dwellings, enhancing evidence through data collection and sharing, supporting efforts and investment in upskilling and reskilling, facilitating the mobility of construction workers, and boosting the simplification of permitting; calls for the European Affordable Housing Plan to be aligned with the European Pillar of Social Rights, and for it to help tackle social inequalities, eradicate poverty in the EU, and promote social, economic and territorial cohesion and upward convergence;’
-
Vote 11:Paragraph 4 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 4/2
Adopted 516 for, 79 against, 33 abstained
13:20Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
‘points out that housing is a Member State competence’
-
Vote 12:Paragraph 4 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
‘points out that housing is a Member State competence’
-
Vote 13:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 4
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 14:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 4
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 20:Separate vote on paragraph 6
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 22:Paragraph 11 — part 1
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/1
Adopted 565 for, 39 against, 21 abstained
13:22Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘large-scale’ and ‘abusive’ and ‘by reducing regulatory burdens, refraining from adding further administrative layers, eliminating unnecessary obstacles and red tape, and alleviating bottlenecks in local, national and EU legislation that undermine the competitiveness of the construction and renovation sectors,’, ‘calls for a joint regulatory audit by the Commission and the European Court of Auditors of EU legislation that may be hindering affordable housing supply; considers that such an audit should remedy the identified shortcomings;’ ‘recalls that evidence shows that price controls and state interventions can lead to unexpected outcomes, and any such measures should be targeted to limit distortions in the market; notes that such measures create uncertainty, discourage investment, and deter those who could help expand supply;’
-
Vote 23:Paragraph 11 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/2
Adopted 329 for, 260 against, 32 abstained
13:22Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘large-scale’
-
Vote 24:Paragraph 11 — part 3
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/3
Adopted 451 for, 147 against, 24 abstained
13:22Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘abusive’
-
Vote 25:Paragraph 11 — part 4
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/4
Adopted 477 for, 120 against, 18 abstained
13:22Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
‘by reducing regulatory burdens, refraining from adding further administrative layers, eliminating unnecessary obstacles and red tape, and alleviating bottlenecks in local, national and EU legislation that undermine the competitiveness of the construction and renovation sectors,’
-
Vote 26:Paragraph 11 — part 5
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/5
Adopted 545 for, 29 against, 52 abstained
13:22Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘calls for a joint regulatory audit by the Commission and the European Court of Auditors of EU legislation that may be hindering affordable housing supply;’
-
Vote 27:Paragraph 11 — part 6
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/6
Adopted 516 for, 40 against, 66 abstained
13:23Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘considers that such an audit should remedy the identified shortcomings;’
-
Vote 28:Paragraph 11 — part 7
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 11/7
Adopted 439 for, 160 against, 23 abstained
13:23Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR, The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
‘recalls that evidence shows that price controls and state interventions can lead to unexpected outcomes, and any such measures should be targeted to limit distortions in the market; notes that such measures create uncertainty, discourage investment, and deter those who could help expand supply;’
-
Vote 29:Separate vote on paragraph 12
Rejected show of hands
Roll call requested by The Left, EPP, Greens
-
Vote 30:Separate vote on paragraph 12
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 12
Adopted 437 for, 156 against, 34 abstained
13:23Roll call requested by The Left, EPP, Greens
-
Vote 31:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 12
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 32:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 12
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 33:Separate vote on paragraph 13
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, Patriots
-
Vote 34:Paragraph 13 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 13/2
Adopted 443 for, 87 against, 96 abstained
13:24Split vote by ECR, Patriots
The part voted on
‘urges competent public authorities to mobilise publicly owned land, review land zoning regulations and reclassify infrastructure-ready land for immediate development, to fast-track the delivery of affordable housing and cooperative, social and non-profit models; highlights that any land-use strategy must balance housing needs with high-quality construction standards;’
-
Vote 35:Paragraph 13 — part 3
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 13/3
Adopted 540 for, 69 against, 9 abstained
13:24Split vote by ECR, Patriots
‘including the development of public infrastructure,’
-
Vote 36:Paragraph 13 — part 4
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 13/4
Adopted 462 for, 101 against, 63 abstained
13:24Split vote by ECR, Patriots
‘to ensure social cohesion and prevent socio-economic segregation and market-distorting practices;’
-
Vote 42:Paragraph 16 — part 1
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/1
Adopted 577 for, 44 against, 7 abstained
13:25Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘including through measures such as introducing the principle of positive administrative silence for the issuance of building permits for new construction and renovation works,’, ‘calls on the Commission to urge the Member States to set out a goal to achieve housing permits within a deadline of 60 days to deliver decent, sustainable and affordable housing;’ ‘calls on the Member States to promote the delivery of housing’ and ‘priority’ and ‘allowing shorter procedures to be activated at national level and to introduce fast-track approval procedures’
-
Vote 43:Paragraph 16 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/2
Adopted 466 for, 133 against, 25 abstained
13:25Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR
The part voted on
‘including through measures such as introducing the principle of positive administrative silence for the issuance of building permits for new construction and renovation works,’
-
Vote 44:Paragraph 16 — part 3
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/3
Adopted 526 for, 79 against, 14 abstained
13:26Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR
The part voted on
‘calls on the Commission to urge the Member States to set out a goal to achieve housing permits within a deadline of 60 days to deliver decent, sustainable and affordable housing;’ without the words: ‘housing permits within a deadline of 60 days to deliver’
-
Vote 45:Paragraph 16 — part 4
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/4
Adopted 424 for, 157 against, 42 abstained
13:26Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR
‘housing permits within a deadline of 60 days to deliver’
-
Vote 46:Paragraph 16 — part 5
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/5
Adopted 553 for, 34 against, 27 abstained
13:26Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR
‘calls on the Member States to promote the delivery of housing’
-
Vote 47:Paragraph 16 — part 6
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/6
Adopted 431 for, 132 against, 66 abstained
13:26Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR
‘priority’
-
Vote 48:Paragraph 16 — part 7
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 16/7
Adopted 486 for, 119 against, 20 abstained
13:26Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, ECR
‘allowing shorter procedures to be activated at national level and to introduce fast-track approval procedures’
-
Vote 49:Separate vote on paragraph 17
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 50:Paragraph 17 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 17/2
Adopted 440 for, 156 against, 25 abstained
13:27Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 51:Separate vote on paragraph 19
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 52:Paragraph 19 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 19/2
Adopted 518 for, 87 against, 23 abstained
13:27Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘calls on the Commission and the Member States to fully integrate the Commission’s Renovation Wave strategy into housing policies, including support schemes for private housing upgrades, ensuring that building renovation is not only focused on energy efficiency and decarbonisation, but also on social fairness and the expansion of affordable housing supply, improving quality of life, preventing disproportionate rent hikes during renovations and reducing long-term housing costs; stresses the importance of setting specific renovation earmarks within the forthcoming European Affordable Housing Plan and of contributing to improving the average energy performance levels of the residential housing sector and prioritising the worst performing buildings; calls on Member States facing high concentrations of low-efficiency, standardised multistorey buildings to develop mechanisms that enable the necessary renovation rates to meet EU targets; supports incentives for the renovation of dwellings in densely populated areas and advocates solutions that positively incentivise owners to put houses back on the market to make them available for long-term renting, particularly in pressured urban areas; underlines that when designing housing policies, competent authorities should be able to carry out a single and thorough environmental assessment, avoiding unnecessary duplications, and complete the necessary administrative and procedural steps for a given geographic area prior to the development of residential projects;’
-
Vote 53:Paragraph 20 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
Text as a whole without the words: ‘stresses the importance of the social climate plans in supporting renovation to help tackle high energy prices;’
-
Vote 54:Paragraph 20 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
those words
-
Vote 64:Paragraph 21 — part 1 of 3
Rejected show of hands
Split vote by Greens, The Left
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘acknowledges that the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive imposes building requirements that could affect construction costs;’ do not have a negative impact on both rental and property markets; expresses concern about the calculation methods and inconsistencies in the energy labelling of residential buildings, which should’, ‘warns about the possible consequences of such labelling; acknowledges that the practical implementation of the Energy Efficiency Directive affects many construction companies and private owners;’ and ‘while respecting national priorities and available resources’
-
Vote 65:Paragraph 21 — part 1
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21/1
Adopted 499 for, 105 against, 19 abstained
13:30Split vote by Greens, The Left
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘acknowledges that the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive imposes building requirements that could affect construction costs;’ do not have a negative impact on both rental and property markets; expresses concern about the calculation methods and inconsistencies in the energy labelling of residential buildings, which should’, ‘warns about the possible consequences of such labelling; acknowledges that the practical implementation of the Energy Efficiency Directive affects many construction companies and private owners;’ and ‘while respecting national priorities and available resources’
-
Vote 66:Paragraph 21 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21/2
Adopted 493 for, 114 against, 8 abstained
13:30Split vote by Greens, The Left
‘acknowledges that the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive imposes building requirements that could affect construction costs;’
-
Vote 67:Paragraph 21 — part 2 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens, The Left
‘acknowledges that the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive imposes building requirements that could affect construction costs;’
-
Vote 68:Paragraph 21 — part 4
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 21/4
Adopted 487 for, 125 against, 10 abstained
13:30Split vote by Greens, The Left
The part voted on
‘warns about the possible consequences of such labelling; acknowledges that the practical implementation of the Energy Efficiency Directive affects many construction companies and private owners;’
-
Vote 69:Paragraph 21 — part 3 of 3
Adopted 494 for, 114 against, 12 abstained
Split vote by Greens, The Left
The part voted on
‘do not have a negative impact on both rental and property markets; expresses concern about the calculation methods and inconsistencies in the energy labelling of residential buildings, which should’
-
Vote 71:Paragraph 22 — part 1 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens, ECR, Patriots
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘and incentive-based’ and ‘the Commission and’ and ‘new construction; calls, following a comprehensive impact assessment, for a reform of the VAT Directive that could allow for the application of a super-reduced value added tax rate to the supply and construction of housing, as part of a social policy, as defined by the Member States, to renovation and alteration, including demolition and reconstruction, and repairing of housing and private dwellings, and to the letting of immovable property for residential use;’ ‘respect fiscal neutrality’ and ‘be consistent with the EU’s objectives’
-
Vote 72:Paragraph 22 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 22/2
Adopted 489 for, 122 against, 11 abstained
13:31Split vote by Greens, ECR, Patriots
‘and incentive-based’
-
Vote 73:Paragraph 22 — part 2 of 3
Rejected 264 for, 338 against, 12 abstained
Split vote by Greens, ECR, Patriots
‘and incentive-based’
-
Vote 74:Paragraph 22 — part 4
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 22/4
Adopted 461 for, 127 against, 33 abstained
13:32Split vote by Greens, ECR, Patriots
The part voted on
‘new construction; calls, following a comprehensive impact assessment, for a reform of the VAT Directive that could allow for the application of a super-reduced value added tax rate to the supply and construction of housing, as part of a social policy, as defined by the Member States, to renovation and alteration, including demolition and reconstruction, and repairing of housing and private dwellings, and to the letting of immovable property for residential use;’
-
Vote 75:Paragraph 22 — part 3 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens, ECR, Patriots
‘the Commission and’
-
Vote 76:Paragraph 22 — part 6
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 22/6
Adopted 441 for, 166 against, 17 abstained
13:32Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Greens, ECR, Patriots
‘be consistent with the EU’s objectives’
-
Vote 79:Paragraph 23 — part 1
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 23/1
Adopted 558 for, 40 against, 22 abstained
13:33Split vote by Greens
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘increasing mobility and’ and ‘any tax and’ and ‘incentives to’ and ‘housing’ and ‘market’ and ‘and market-distorting practices’
-
Vote 80:Separate vote on paragraph 23
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens
-
Vote 81:Paragraph 23 — part 3
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 23/3
Adopted 444 for, 164 against, 18 abstained
13:33Split vote by Greens
‘and market-distorting practices’
-
Vote 82:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 23
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 89:Separate vote on paragraph 28
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 28
Adopted 449 for, 129 against, 40 abstained
13:35Roll call requested by EPP, Greens
-
Vote 92:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 28
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 94:Paragraph 29 — part 1
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 29/1
Adopted 558 for, 47 against, 18 abstained
13:36Roll call requested by EPP, S&D · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘Encourages property owners to offer long-term and stable rental contracts, in order to enhance security of tenure and provide greater predictability for tenants; encourages the Member States to increase transparency in the private rental sector, based on the advertised prices, with the aim of improving housing conditions for tenants, and to strengthen national legislation in this regard; calls on the Member States to strengthen the protection of tenants’ rights, including by encouraging online rental platforms to provide information on average rent levels in the area, in order to ensure fair conditions and prevent disproportionate rent increases; calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen their commitment to ensuring equality and non-discrimination in the housing sector; calls for coordinated responses from social services to resolve tenant-owner conflicts and prevent further vulnerability of the parties involved, including small owners and vulnerable tenants in these circumstances; encourages the Member States to offer legal dispute settlement mechanisms for resolving housing-related disputes, for example, in cases of prolonged or abusive non-compliance with rental contracts that deprive owners of the legitimate use of their homes, as well as landlords who fail to comply with tenants obligations; calls on public authorities to protect families, in particular those with children, for example, by facilitating access to temporary shelter to address short-term vulnerability, with the protection of vulnerable families resting with competent authorities; underlines that local authorities need to identify and address cases of non-compliance with property, management and safety requirements, contributing to higher standards in the private rental market; condemns abusive housing practices that subject tenants in vulnerable situations to inadequate, unsafe or unsanitary conditions;’ without the words ‘long-term and’
-
Vote 95:Paragraph 29 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 29/2
Adopted 506 for, 88 against, 27 abstained
13:36Roll call requested by EPP, S&D · split vote by Patriots
‘long-term and’
-
Vote 96:Paragraph 29 — part 3
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 29/3
Adopted 498 for, 97 against, 22 abstained
13:36Roll call requested by Patriots, EPP, S&D · split vote by Patriots
‘supports the role of tenants’ unions and housing civil society actors as stakeholders in housing policy;’
-
Vote 102:Paragraph 30 — part 1
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 30/1
Adopted 565 for, 46 against, 15 abstained
13:37Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘Is concerned about the labour gap and the lack of competitiveness in the construction and renovation sectors, and the shortage of skilled workers; calls for the European Affordable Housing Plan to be connected to the EU Quality Jobs Roadmap; underlines that the housing crisis cannot be solved without a fully trained and mobile construction workforce; stresses the importance of improving the working conditions of construction workers in order to address labour shortages and attract a skilled workforce;’
-
Vote 103:Paragraph 30 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 30/2
Adopted 452 for, 86 against, 81 abstained
13:38Roll call requested by Patriots, S&D · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘underlines, therefore, the need to guarantee fair wages, stable employment, safe working conditions, improved contracts, and health and safety standards; stresses that workers’ rights should be respected and enforced, and encourages effective monitoring, including the use of digital tools and company registers to detect fraud; calls for national measures to prevent accidents at construction sites; calls for strengthening the implementation of the EU occupational safety and health acquis; calls for the Member States to improve collective bargaining for workers in the construction and renovation sectors;’
-
Vote 104:Separate vote on paragraph 31
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 105:Paragraph 31 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 31/2
Adopted 440 for, 157 against, 24 abstained
13:38Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 106:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 31
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 107:Separate vote on paragraph 32
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 32
Adopted 483 for, 106 against, 32 abstained
13:38Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 108:Paragraph 33 — part 1 of 4
Rejected show of hands
Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
‘Encourages the Commission and the Member States to ensure that legal labour migrants and seasonal workers whose accommodation is provided through their employer have access to decent, sustainable and affordable housing; stresses that no worker should be forced to live in overcrowded or poor conditions;’ without the words: ‘legal’ and ‘whose accommodation is provided through their employer’
-
Vote 109:Paragraph 33 — part 2 of 4
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘legal’
-
Vote 110:Paragraph 33 — part 3 of 4
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘whose accommodation is provided through their employer’
-
Vote 111:Paragraph 33 — part 4 of 4
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
‘calls for strengthened monitoring in this regard; calls on the Commission and the Member States to analyse the social and territorial effects of concentrated housing for labour migrants and seasonal workers; stresses the need to assess whether such spatial segregation undermines social cohesion and the integration of communities; calls on the Member States to collect data at regional and local level on the location and conditions of employer-provided accommodation; calls for a review of the European Labour Authority for more effective cross-border enforcement;’ without the words: ‘calls on the Commission and the Member States to analyse the social and territorial effects of concentrated housing for labour migrants and seasonal workers;’ and ‘calls for a review of the European Labour Authority for more effective cross-border enforcement;’
-
Vote 112:Paragraph 33 — part 4
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 33/4
Adopted 451 for, 165 against, 10 abstained
13:39Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
‘calls for strengthened monitoring in this regard; calls on the Commission and the Member States to analyse the social and territorial effects of concentrated housing for labour migrants and seasonal workers; stresses the need to assess whether such spatial segregation undermines social cohesion and the integration of communities; calls on the Member States to collect data at regional and local level on the location and conditions of employer-provided accommodation; calls for a review of the European Labour Authority for more effective cross-border enforcement;’ without the words: ‘calls on the Commission and the Member States to analyse the social and territorial effects of concentrated housing for labour migrants and seasonal workers;’ and ‘calls for a review of the European Labour Authority for more effective cross-border enforcement;’
-
Vote 113:Paragraph 33 — part 5
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 33/5
Adopted 443 for, 153 against, 23 abstained
13:39Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘calls on the Commission and the Member States to analyse the social and territorial effects of concentrated housing for labour migrants and seasonal workers;’
-
Vote 114:Paragraph 33 — part 6
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 33/6
Adopted 428 for, 151 against, 13 abstained
13:39Split vote by ECR, The Left, Patriots
‘calls for a review of the European Labour Authority for more effective cross-border enforcement;’
-
Vote 115:Separate vote on paragraph 34
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 116:Paragraph 34 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 34/2
Adopted 449 for, 163 against, 13 abstained
13:40Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 118:Paragraph 35 — part 1 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, Patriots
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls on public authorities to effectively regulate subcontracting, ensuring that public funds support companies that provide high-quality social working conditions and respect industry standards; calls on the Commission to reflect on the inclusion of social and environmental standards in the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directive and to ensure transparency regarding subcontractors and the extent of subcontracted work;’
-
Vote 119:Paragraph 35 — part 2 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, Patriots
The part voted on
‘calls on public authorities to effectively regulate subcontracting, ensuring that public funds support companies that provide high-quality social working conditions and respect industry standards; calls on the Commission to reflect on the inclusion of social and environmental standards in the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directive and to ensure transparency regarding subcontractors and the extent of subcontracted work;’
-
Vote 120:Paragraph 35 — part 3 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, Patriots
The part voted on
‘calls on the Commission to reflect on the inclusion of social and environmental standards in the upcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directive and to ensure transparency regarding subcontractors and the extent of subcontracted work;’
-
Vote 121:Separate vote on subheading 11
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 122:Separate vote on paragraph 36
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 124:Paragraph 37 — part 1 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘can’ and ‘underlines the importance of favouring projects aimed at enhancing inclusive neighbourhoods with opportunities for all;’ ‘acknowledges the maintenance costs of public housing stock, and therefore encourages efficient and effective processes aimed at reducing the budgetary burden for public administrations and citizens;’
-
Vote 125:Paragraph 37 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 37/2
Adopted 469 for, 130 against, 22 abstained
13:41Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by The Left, Patriots
‘can’
-
Vote 126:Paragraph 37 — part 2 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by The Left, Patriots
‘can’
-
Vote 127:Paragraph 37 — part 3 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by The Left, Patriots
‘underlines the importance of favouring projects aimed at enhancing inclusive neighbourhoods with opportunities for all;’
-
Vote 132:Separate vote on paragraph 39
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by ECR
-
Vote 134:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 39
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 136:Paragraph 40 — part 1 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘may’ and ‘the right to private property ownership, legal certainty for owners, and’, ‘considers that certain measures could help urban centres regain their residential functions, such as adequate and proportionate licensing systems, increased transparency regarding large-scale foreign property acquisitions in order to monitor housing availability, authorisations from neighbours’ associations or the main owner, or safety, quality and consumer protection standards, ensuring that those policies are proportionate and tailored to the specific circumstances;’ underlines that measures are needed to safeguard housing for residents and preserve the diversity and vitality of urban communities;
-
Vote 137:Paragraph 40 — part 2 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by The Left, Patriots
‘may’
-
Vote 138:Paragraph 40 — part 3 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by The Left, Patriots
‘the right to private property ownership, legal certainty for owners, and’
-
Vote 139:Paragraph 40 — part 4
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 40/4
Adopted 542 for, 43 against, 36 abstained
13:43Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by The Left, Patriots
The part voted on
‘considers that certain measures could help urban centres regain their residential functions, such as adequate and proportionate licensing systems, increased transparency regarding large-scale foreign property acquisitions in order to monitor housing availability, authorisations from neighbours’ associations or the main owner, or safety, quality and consumer protection standards, ensuring that those policies are proportionate and tailored to the specific circumstances; underlines that measures are needed to safeguard housing for residents and preserve the diversity and vitality of urban communities;’
-
Vote 141:Paragraph 41 — part 1 of 6
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘the mobilisation of private investment, as it is important to complement’ and ‘and as the public sector alone cannot address the current lack of liquidity in the market’ and ‘the private sector’ and ‘and listed real estate companies’ and ‘notes that market-based housing solutions remain an effective way to sustainably expand supply and highlights the importance of an investment-friendly regulatory environment in this regard;’ ‘calls for the completion of the Savings and Investments Union as a way to enhance the availability of private capital across borders;’ and ‘calls on the Member States to explore dedicated housing investment vehicles to channel private savings into affordable housing projects;
-
Vote 142:Paragraph 41 — part 2 of 6
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens
‘the mobilisation of private investment, as it is important to complement’
-
Vote 143:Paragraph 41 — part 3 of 6
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens
‘and as the public sector alone cannot address the current lack of liquidity in the market’
-
Vote 144:Paragraph 41 — part 4 of 6
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens
‘the private sector’
-
Vote 145:Paragraph 41 — part 5
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 41/5
Adopted 453 for, 147 against, 21 abstained
13:44Split vote by Greens
‘and listed real estate companies’
-
Vote 146:Paragraph 41 — part 6
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 41/6
Adopted 480 for, 132 against, 11 abstained
13:44Split vote by Greens
The part voted on
‘notes that market-based housing solutions remain an effective way to sustainably expand supply and highlights the importance of an investment-friendly regulatory environment in this regard;’
-
Vote 147:Paragraph 41 — part 5 of 6
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens
‘and listed real estate companies’
-
Vote 148:Paragraph 41 — part 6 of 6
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens
The part voted on
‘notes that market-based housing solutions remain an effective way to sustainably expand supply and highlights the importance of an investment-friendly regulatory environment in this regard;’
-
Vote 151:Separate vote on paragraph 42
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens
-
Vote 152:Paragraph 42 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 42/2
Adopted 447 for, 128 against, 48 abstained
13:45Split vote by Greens
The part voted on
‘notes that the Capital Requirements Directive allows Member States to introduce systemic risk buffers for certain exposures and that some opted to introduce systemic risk buffers for certain exposures secured by residential property, which increase the financing costs for commercial real estate; calls on the European Banking Authority to make full use of the flexibilities under its guidelines to support mortgages on residential property, while ensuring financial stability; calls on the Member States to carefully assess the appropriateness of the level of systemic risk buffers for exposures collateralised by residential property; supports the possibility provided in the Capital Requirements Regulation to allow for preferential prudential treatment of exposures relating to land acquisition, development and construction, thereby facilitating access to financing for housing development;’
-
Vote 153:Paragraph 42 — part 3
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 42/3
Adopted 454 for, 141 against, 24 abstained
13:45Split vote by Greens
The part voted on
‘welcomes, in this regard, the review of the EU securitisation framework presented by the Commission on 17 June 2025 with the aim of freeing up banks’ balance sheets and enhancing banks’ lending capacity; calls on the Commission to assess the impact of the Capital Requirements Regulation on small construction companies, in order to ensure that loans for residential projects are dealt with in a proportional manner, reflecting the fact that lower systemic risk projects are often pre-sold, insured or guaranteed by public authorities;’
-
Vote 158:Paragraph 43 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘underlines the role of the Stability and Growth Pact in ensuring financial stability in the EU, which is a prerequisite for the proliferation of housing;’
-
Vote 159:Paragraph 43 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
those words
-
Vote 160:Separate vote on paragraph 44
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 161:Paragraph 45 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Renew, ECR, Patriots
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘recommends a stronger InvestEU programme for the 2028-2034 period to increase the volume of guarantees backed by the EU budget for decent, sustainable and affordable housing projects;’ and ‘further explore the added value of creating a European housing agency,’
-
Vote 162:Paragraph 45 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Renew, ECR, Patriots
The part voted on
‘recommends a stronger InvestEU programme for the 2028-2034 period to increase the volume of guarantees backed by the EU budget for decent, sustainable and affordable housing projects;’
-
Vote 163:Paragraph 45 — part 3
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 45/3
Adopted 359 for, 230 against, 26 abstained
13:47Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Renew, ECR, Patriots
‘further explore the added value of creating a European housing agency,’
-
Vote 165:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 45
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 166:Paragraph 46 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘urges the Member States to adopt multi-annual social housing delivery targets, including in relation to infrastructure and services;’
-
Vote 167:Paragraph 46 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
those words
-
Vote 169:Paragraph 47 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens
Text as a whole without the words: ‘and international financial institutions’ and ‘and securitisation’
-
Vote 170:Paragraph 47 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens
‘and international financial institutions’
-
Vote 171:Paragraph 47 — part 3
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 47/3
Adopted 452 for, 151 against, 18 abstained
13:48Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by Greens
‘and securitisation’
-
Vote 173:Paragraph 48 — part 1
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/1
Adopted 506 for, 106 against, 9 abstained
13:49Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, Patriots
The part voted on
‘Calls on the Commission to analyse housing price dynamics, including available evidence of potentially abusive speculation, and, on the basis of this analysis, to call on the Member States for possible appropriate measures;’ without the words: ‘potentially abusive’
-
Vote 174:Paragraph 48 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/2
Adopted 458 for, 140 against, 18 abstained
13:49Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, Patriots
‘potentially abusive’
-
Vote 175:Paragraph 48 — part 3
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/3
Adopted 514 for, 84 against, 17 abstained
13:49Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, Patriots
The part voted on
‘stresses the importance of safeguarding financial stability and ensuring that financial instruments contribute to ensuring decent, sustainable and affordable housing for all; calls on the Commission and the Member States to enhance transparency in real estate transactions, including through improved data collection’
-
Vote 176:Paragraph 48 — part 4
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/4
Adopted 485 for, 106 against, 15 abstained
13:49Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, Patriots
The part voted on
‘and possible EU-level tools; calls on the Commission and the Member States to exchange data and best practice on combating abusive financialisation practices and speculative purchases, reducing the likelihood of destabilising local housing markets;’ without the word: ‘abusive’
-
Vote 177:Paragraph 48 — part 5
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/5
Adopted 469 for, 129 against, 13 abstained
13:49Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, Patriots
‘abusive’
-
Vote 178:Paragraph 48 — part 6
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/6
Adopted 549 for, 35 against, 29 abstained
13:50Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, Patriots
The part voted on
‘calls on the Member States to adopt measures to incentivise bringing vacant and derelict homes back into use, as this is essential to increasing supply, safeguarding affordability, and revitalising communities; stresses that public investment in housing should serve the public interest and deliver long-term value; welcomes public ownership models where housing remains publicly managed,’
-
Vote 179:Paragraph 48 — part 7
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/7
Adopted 532 for, 60 against, 21 abstained
13:50Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, Patriots
The part voted on
‘which could be useful in certain contexts to prevent abusive financialisation practices,’ without the words: ‘could be useful in certain contexts to’ and ‘abusive’
-
Vote 180:Paragraph 48 — part 8
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/8
Adopted 475 for, 134 against, 17 abstained
13:50Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, Patriots
‘could be useful in certain contexts to’
-
Vote 181:Paragraph 48 — part 9
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/9
Adopted 450 for, 138 against, 25 abstained
13:50Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, Patriots
‘abusive’
-
Vote 182:Paragraph 48 — part 10
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/10
Adopted 474 for, 123 against, 16 abstained
13:50Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, Patriots
The part voted on
‘underlining that housing projects that pass into private hands are also legitimate;’ ‘stresses that Member States should be free to choose how to manage these projects in line with their national policies;’
-
Vote 186:Separate vote on paragraph 49
Rejected show of hands
Split vote by The Left
-
Vote 187:Separate vote on paragraph 49
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by The Left
-
Vote 188:Separate vote on paragraph 49
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by The Left
-
Vote 195:Paragraph 53 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Greens, ECR
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘recognises that private home savings funds are a practical and effective tool for individuals and families to invest in housing and encourage greater accessibility to mortgage funding; calls on the Member States to facilitate the implementation and promotion of these measures as part of broader efforts to address the housing crisis;’ and ‘with a dedicated budget of at least EUR 20 billion’
-
Vote 196:Paragraph 53 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 53/2
Adopted 480 for, 111 against, 24 abstained
13:53Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by Greens, ECR
The part voted on
‘recognises that private home savings funds are a practical and effective tool for individuals and families to invest in housing and encourage greater accessibility to mortgage funding; calls on the Member States to facilitate the implementation and promotion of these measures as part of broader efforts to address the housing crisis;’
-
Vote 197:Paragraph 53 — part 2 of 2
Rejected show of hands
Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by Greens, ECR
The part voted on
‘recognises that private home savings funds are a practical and effective tool for individuals and families to invest in housing and encourage greater accessibility to mortgage funding; calls on the Member States to facilitate the implementation and promotion of these measures as part of broader efforts to address the housing crisis;’
-
Vote 200:Separate vote on paragraph 55
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 201:Paragraph 55 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 55/2
Adopted 432 for, 137 against, 41 abstained
13:54Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
‘calls on the Commission to integrate gender-based violence considerations into EU housing policy;’
-
Vote 203:Paragraph 57 — part 1
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 57/1
Adopted 550 for, 49 against, 20 abstained
13:54Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘recalls that action on homelessness is primarily a competence of the Member States, while the EU should support and coordinate efforts;’ and ‘calls on the Member States to adopt national targets to prevent the eviction of children in cases where there is a clear risk of homelessness’
-
Vote 204:Paragraph 57 — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 57/2
Adopted 524 for, 75 against, 13 abstained
13:55Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 206:Separate vote on paragraph 58
Rejected show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 207:Separate vote on paragraph 58
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 208:Separate vote on paragraph 58
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 209:Separate vote on citation 47
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Citation 47
Adopted 356 for, 188 against, 57 abstained
13:55Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 210:Vote on text inserted after recital C
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 211:Recital G — part 1 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Renew, The Left
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas simplifying and streamlining the complex set of rules in order to speed up housing construction, repurposing and renovation across Europe is crucial for the provision of decent, sustainable and affordable housing;’ and ‘where needed’
-
Vote 212:Recital G — part 2 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Renew, The Left
The part voted on
‘whereas simplifying and streamlining the complex set of rules in order to speed up housing construction, repurposing and renovation across Europe is crucial for the provision of decent, sustainable and affordable housing;’
-
Vote 213:Recital G — part 3 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Renew, The Left
‘where needed’
-
Vote 216:Vote on text inserted after recital F
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 218:Vote on text inserted after recital H
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 219:Recital J — part 1
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital J/1
Adopted 573 for, 43 against, 10 abstained
13:57Split vote by ECR, Patriots
The part voted on
‘whereas 10.6 % of EU citizens reported being unable to adequately heat their homes in 2023; whereas key EU legislation to achieve long-term financial stability, such as the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive and the Energy Efficiency Directive, sets technical requirements regarding sustainability, energy efficiency, and safety; whereas the Energy Efficiency Directive, which was revised in 2023, raises the EU energy efficiency target, requiring a further 11.7 % reduction in energy consumption by 2030;’ without the words: ‘whereas key EU legislation to achieve long-term financial stability, such as the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive and the Energy Efficiency Directive, sets technical requirements regarding sustainability, energy efficiency, and safety;’
-
Vote 220:Recital J — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital J/2
Adopted 422 for, 172 against, 25 abstained
13:57Split vote by ECR, Patriots
The part voted on
‘whereas key EU legislation to achieve long-term financial stability, such as the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive and the Energy Efficiency Directive, sets technical requirements regarding sustainability, energy efficiency, and safety;’
-
Vote 221:Separate vote on recital J
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, Patriots
-
Vote 222:Recital K — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘whereas energy poverty is an issue affecting all Member States and has a disproportionate impact on vulnerable families, including children and elderly, particularly in large, ageing housing blocks with low energy efficiency that result in high heating costs; whereas 14.5 million children in the EU lived in homes with leaks, damp or mould in 2023 and 154 000 Europeans die prematurely every year due to poor indoor air quality; whereas 75 % of the EU’s building stock has a poor energy performance rating; whereas energy-efficient buildings powered by renewable energy could reduce energy bills, improve health and well-being, and minimise long-term operational costs; whereas buildings account for 40 % of final energy consumption in the EU; whereas all EU countries should have established a draft national building renovation plan by 31 December 2025; whereas the plans will provide essential information for housing policies, including an overview of the national building stock, investment needs and financing sources; whereas the speed and level of renovations is still unsatisfactory; whereas energy-efficient renovation is unattractive for older people, who have the highest rate of ownership of old homes;’
-
Vote 223:Recital K — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
‘whereas the Renovation Wave initiative should promote energy-efficient retrofits aiming for energy performance levels at reasonable cost-efficiency;’
-
Vote 224:Separate vote on recital N
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
-
Vote 225:Recital N — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital N/2
Adopted 443 for, 161 against, 21 abstained
13:57Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 227:Recital O — part 1
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital O/1
Adopted 539 for, 77 against, 5 abstained
13:58Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by The Left
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas private property is threatened by illegal occupation, known as squatting, and systematic non-payment of rent phenomena, which harms communities and particularly small property owners, forcing them to exit the market and to rightfully recover their property, thereby reducing the available supply and contributing to rising prices; whereas illegally staying in a property undermines the EU Charter and constitutes a violation of the rule of law;’
-
Vote 228:Recital O — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – recital O/2
Adopted 478 for, 116 against, 22 abstained
13:58Roll call requested by The Left, Patriots · split vote by The Left
those words
-
Vote 229:Vote on text inserted after recital O
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 231:Recital P — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas forced evictions are defined as the permanent or temporary removal, against their will, of individuals, families or communities from the homes or land they occupy, without the provision of, and access to, appropriate forms of legal or other protection;’
-
Vote 232:Recital P — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 233:Recital Q — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘and relatively high levels of temporary employment and self-employment associated with long subcontracting chains and the cyclical and project-based nature of employment in the sector’
-
Vote 234:Recital Q — part 2 of 2
Adopted 365 for, 230 against, 16 abstained
Split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 235:Separate vote on recital R
Rejected show of hands
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by ECR
-
Vote 236:Recital R — part 1
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Recital R/1
Adopted 562 for, 34 against, 21 abstained
13:59Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by ECR
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas labour migrants and seasonal workers make a contribution to key sectors across the EU, yet many are housed in overcrowded or poor accommodation;’ and ‘whereas the responsibility of the private sector to end these types of practices must be clearly defined;’
-
Vote 237:Recital R — part 2
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Recital R/2
Adopted 441 for, 148 against, 20 abstained
14:00Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by ECR
‘whereas labour migrants and seasonal workers make a contribution to key sectors across the EU, yet many are housed in overcrowded or poor accommodation;’
-
Vote 238:Recital R — part 3
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Recital R/3
Adopted 457 for, 138 against, 14 abstained
14:00Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by ECR
‘whereas the responsibility of the private sector to end these types of practices must be clearly defined;’
-
Vote 240:Vote on text inserted after recital S
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 241:Vote on text inserted after recital S
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 242:Recital T — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas the EU’s fragmented and inconsistent legal framework on short-term rentals is undermining enforcement;’
-
Vote 243:Recital T — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
those words
-
Vote 244:Recital U — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘whereas access to housing finance is essential to meet housing needs, as well as to support construction, renovation and repurposing, in particular for the approximately 3.8 million SMEs active in the EU construction sector; whereas improving access to credit, without compromising on macroeconomic prudence, should be part of a balanced response to the housing crisis; whereas access to credit for construction has significantly tightened since 2008, with banks reporting declining loan demands across the EU, with mortgage interest rates having increased, thus limiting the development of affordable housing and the sustainable renovation of existing stock; whereas the entire prudential framework should be aimed primarily at ensuring financial stability, focusing on sound banking criteria, and preventing housing bubbles; whereas private developers can play an important role in delivering diverse housing solutions efficiently and sustainably, and at a price that people can afford; whereas crowding-in private investment therefore could be helpful; whereas the renovation, conversion and extension of the existing housing stock is a cost-effective and rapid solution to the housing crisis; whereas, according to the European Central Bank, the last 15 years have seen increased divergence in residential real estate market access, with low- and middle- income households facing greater difficulties in obtaining credit for home purchases; whereas access to loans for purchasing a home can be challenging, specifically for young families and in rural areas, and access to long-term, affordable financing is therefore needed; whereas the regulation of mortgage markets can play a key role in supporting housing affordability;’
-
Vote 245:Recital U — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘whereas the linkage between real estate trusts and funds, banks and other institutional investors, may pose risks to financial stability; whereas such interlinkages should be subject to transparent reporting;’
-
Vote 246:Vote on text inserted after recital U
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 247:Vote on text inserted after recital U
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 248:Vote on text inserted after recital U
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 249:Recital V — part 1 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘whereas social and affordable housing is financed by national, regional, and local authorities, with the EU playing a key role through funding instruments, cooperation facilitation and best practice exchanges among Member States and cities; whereas investment in social and affordable housing stock has declined dramatically since the 2008 financial crisis; whereas the proportion of public, cooperative and social housing has been steadily declining; whereas just 7 % of the EU’s Recovery and Resilience Facility fund in 2024 was spent on social housing and other social infrastructure; whereas, in the implementation of the RRF, shortcomings have been identified with regard to transparency and clarity in the definition and monitoring of criteria at national level; whereas national promotional banks and institutions (NPBIs) play an essential role in financing decent, affordable and sustainable housing, leveraging private investment and strengthening the financing framework at national and regional level; whereas NPBIs have promoted more than 380 000 dwellings across the EU and committed close to EUR 50 billion in financing to the housing sector in 2023 alone, thus strongly complementing EU-level initiatives with their long-lasting expertise and experience;’ without the words: ‘with the EU playing a key role through funding instruments, cooperation facilitation and best practice exchanges among Member States and cities’
-
Vote 250:Recital V — part 2 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
‘with the EU playing a key role through funding instruments, cooperation facilitation and best practice exchanges among Member States and cities’
-
Vote 251:Recital V — part 3 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
‘whereas access to social housing programmes for the most vulnerable groups should be ensured;’
-
Vote 252:Vote on text inserted after recital V
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 253:Recital X — part 1 of 4
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, Patriots
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas the Commission and Member States should adopt multi-year policies aimed at establishing national stocks of affordable and sustainable housing as well as promoting renovations that lower household costs;’ ‘respecting worker’s rights and collective agreements’, ‘whereas the reallocation of unspent Just Transition Fund money could support the construction of housing, as the Commission has encouraged Member States to channel unspent funds to affordable, sustainable and decent housing;’
-
Vote 254:Recital X — part 2 of 4
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, Patriots
The part voted on
‘whereas the Commission and Member States should adopt multi-year policies aimed at establishing national stocks of affordable and sustainable housing as well as promoting renovations that lower household costs;’
-
Vote 255:Recital X — part 3 of 4
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, Patriots
‘respecting worker’s rights and collective agreements’
-
Vote 256:Recital X — part 4 of 4
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR, Patriots
The part voted on
‘whereas the reallocation of unspent Just Transition Fund money could support the construction of housing, as the Commission has encouraged Member States to channel unspent funds to affordable, sustainable and decent housing;’
-
Vote 257:Recital Z — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘whereas in many Member States, rents are rising faster than incomes, waiting lists for public housing are growing, and access to decent, sustainable and affordable housing is becoming out of reach for low- and middle-income households; whereas the loss of purchasing power within low- and middle-income households and rising housing costs undermine the possibility of their acquiring or renting affordable housing, with broader demographic and socio-economic consequences, such as increased levels of social exclusion; whereas housing transactions declined in 2023 compared to 2022 in 13 of the 16 Member States for which data is available, marking a second consecutive year of falling sales; whereas addressing not only the supply but also the strategic location of affordable housing, particularly near employment centres, public services and sustainable transport networks, is essential to reduce commuting burdens and enhance quality of life;’
-
Vote 258:Recital Z — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘whereas an inclusive housing policy should address these inequalities and ensure that everyone, regardless of their background or status, has access to decent, sustainable and affordable housing;’
-
Vote 259:Vote on text inserted after recital AA
Rejected show of hands
The last vote on a text as a whole, after all amendments. It decides whether the text is adopted. · 1
-
Vote 260:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted 367 for, 166 against, 84 abstained
14:02