Paragraph 30 — part 1
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 30/1
Adopted
- For
- 565
- Against
- 46
- Abstained
- 15
roll-call vote at 13:37 · 90% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘Is concerned about the labour gap and the lack of competitiveness in the construction and renovation sectors, and the shortage of skilled workers; calls for the European Affordable Housing Plan to be connected to the EU Quality Jobs Roadmap; underlines that the housing crisis cannot be solved without a fully trained and mobile construction workforce; stresses the importance of improving the working conditions of construction workers in order to address labour shortages and attract a skilled workforce;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 39 | 0 | 0 | 39 | For |
| Greens | 47 | 0 | 0 | 47 | For |
| S&D | 123 | 0 | 0 | 123 | For |
| Renew | 66 | 1 | 2 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 155 | 5 | 2 | 162 | For |
| ECR | 62 | 8 | 2 | 72 | For |
| Patriots | 53 | 8 | 3 | 64 | For |
| ESN | 1 | 21 | 3 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 19 | 3 | 3 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
626 MEPs voted. Open a group, or filter above.
The Left 39 MEPs
Greens 47 MEPs
S&D 123 MEPs
Renew 69 MEPs
EPP 162 MEPs
ECR 72 MEPs
Patriots 64 MEPs
ESN 25 MEPs
No group 25 MEPs
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.