Paragraph 30 — part 1
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 30/1
Adopted
- For
- 565
- Against
- 46
- Abstained
- 15
roll-call vote at 13:37 · 90% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘Is concerned about the labour gap and the lack of competitiveness in the construction and renovation sectors, and the shortage of skilled workers; calls for the European Affordable Housing Plan to be connected to the EU Quality Jobs Roadmap; underlines that the housing crisis cannot be solved without a fully trained and mobile construction workforce; stresses the importance of improving the working conditions of construction workers in order to address labour shortages and attract a skilled workforce;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 39 | 0 | 0 | 39 | For |
| Greens | 47 | 0 | 0 | 47 | For |
| S&D | 123 | 0 | 0 | 123 | For |
| Renew | 66 | 1 | 2 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 155 | 5 | 2 | 162 | For |
| ECR | 62 | 8 | 2 | 72 | For |
| Patriots | 53 | 8 | 3 | 64 | For |
| ESN | 1 | 21 | 3 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 19 | 3 | 3 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 626 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.