Paragraph 48 — part 9
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/9
Adopted
- For
- 450
- Against
- 138
- Abstained
- 25
roll-call vote at 13:50 · 73% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘abusive’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 36 | 0 | 36 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 47 | 0 | 47 | Against |
| S&D | 107 | 14 | 0 | 121 | For |
| Renew | 63 | 4 | 0 | 67 | For |
| EPP | 153 | 3 | 2 | 158 | For |
| ECR | 67 | 0 | 3 | 70 | For |
| Patriots | 48 | 6 | 10 | 64 | For |
| ESN | 1 | 19 | 4 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 11 | 9 | 6 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
613 MEPs voted. Open a group, or filter above.
The Left 36 MEPs
Greens 47 MEPs
S&D 121 MEPs
Renew 67 MEPs
EPP 158 MEPs
ECR 70 MEPs
Patriots 64 MEPs
ESN 24 MEPs
No group 26 MEPs
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.