Paragraph 48 — part 9
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/9
Adopted
- For
- 450
- Against
- 138
- Abstained
- 25
roll-call vote at 13:50 · 73% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘abusive’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 36 | 0 | 36 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 47 | 0 | 47 | Against |
| S&D | 107 | 14 | 0 | 121 | For |
| Renew | 63 | 4 | 0 | 67 | For |
| EPP | 153 | 3 | 2 | 158 | For |
| ECR | 67 | 0 | 3 | 70 | For |
| Patriots | 48 | 6 | 10 | 64 | For |
| ESN | 1 | 19 | 4 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 11 | 9 | 6 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
26 MEPs of 613 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.