Paragraph 42 — part 2
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 42/2
Adopted
- For
- 447
- Against
- 128
- Abstained
- 48
roll-call vote at 13:45 · 72% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by Greens
The part voted on: ‘notes that the Capital Requirements Directive allows Member States to introduce systemic risk buffers for certain exposures and that some opted to introduce systemic risk buffers for certain exposures secured by residential property, which increase the financing costs for commercial real estate; calls on the European Banking Authority to make full use of the flexibilities under its guidelines to support mortgages on residential property, while ensuring financial stability; calls on the Member States to carefully assess the appropriateness of the level of systemic risk buffers for exposures collateralised by residential property; supports the possibility provided in the Capital Requirements Regulation to allow for preferential prudential treatment of exposures relating to land acquisition, development and construction, thereby facilitating access to financing for housing development;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 36 | 2 | 38 | Against |
| Greens | 7 | 35 | 5 | 47 | Against |
| S&D | 102 | 15 | 5 | 122 | For |
| Renew | 69 | 0 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 159 | 0 | 0 | 159 | For |
| ECR | 64 | 3 | 5 | 72 | For |
| Patriots | 27 | 13 | 26 | 66 | Divided |
| ESN | 3 | 19 | 2 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 16 | 7 | 3 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
623 MEPs voted. Open a group, or filter above.
The Left 38 MEPs
Greens 47 MEPs
S&D 122 MEPs
Renew 69 MEPs
EPP 159 MEPs
ECR 72 MEPs
Patriots 66 MEPs
ESN 24 MEPs
No group 26 MEPs
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.