Amendment 80, after paragraph 28
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – After § 28 – Am 80
Rejected
- For
- 153
- Against
- 432
- Abstained
- 27
roll-call vote at 13:35 · 25% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 39 | 0 | 0 | 39 | For |
| Greens | 47 | 0 | 0 | 47 | For |
| S&D | 21 | 99 | 0 | 120 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 66 | 0 | 66 | Against |
| EPP | 2 | 151 | 0 | 153 | Against |
| ECR | 3 | 63 | 5 | 71 | Against |
| Patriots | 25 | 24 | 17 | 66 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 24 | 1 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 16 | 5 | 4 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
612 MEPs voted. Open a group, or filter above.
The Left 39 MEPs
Greens 47 MEPs
S&D 120 MEPs
Renew 66 MEPs
EPP 153 MEPs
ECR 71 MEPs
Patriots 66 MEPs
ESN 25 MEPs
No group 25 MEPs
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.