Paragraph 4 — part 2
Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up
B10-0386/2026 – § 4/2
Adopted
- For
- 499
- Against
- 95
- Abstained
- 19
roll-call vote at 13:28 · 81% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by The Left, Greens
The part voted on: ‘, particularly in mixed fisheries and in situations where choke species generate disproportionate socio-economic consequences;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 21 | 7 | 9 | 37 | Divided |
| Greens | 3 | 46 | 0 | 49 | Against |
| S&D | 88 | 25 | 1 | 114 | For |
| Renew | 58 | 8 | 1 | 67 | For |
| EPP | 155 | 2 | 0 | 157 | For |
| ECR | 70 | 1 | 3 | 74 | For |
| Patriots | 68 | 0 | 0 | 68 | For |
| ESN | 23 | 0 | 2 | 25 | For |
| No group | 13 | 6 | 3 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
67 MEPs of 613 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.