Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up

27 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 5 amendments (5 rejected) and 18 parts of the text voted on separately (18 adopted). 3 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

· 5

  1. Vote 1:Amendment 2 to paragraph 1

    B10-0386/2026 – § 1 – Am 2

    Rejected 134 for, 436 against, 35 abstained

    13:26

    Roll call requested by The Left

  2. Vote 4:Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1

    B10-0386/2026 – After § 1 – Am 3

    Rejected 248 for, 294 against, 60 abstained

    13:27

    Roll call requested by The Left

  3. Vote 5:Amendment 4 to paragraph 2

    B10-0386/2026 – § 2 – Am 4

    Rejected 128 for, 469 against, 14 abstained

    13:27

    Roll call requested by The Left

  4. Vote 8:Amendment 5 to paragraph 4

    B10-0386/2026 – § 4 – Am 5

    Rejected 138 for, 468 against, 2 abstained

    13:27

    Roll call requested by The Left

  5. Vote 23:Amendment 1, adding text after recital G

    B10-0386/2026 – After recital G – Am 1

    Rejected 141 for, 462 against, 11 abstained

    13:30

    Roll call requested by The Left

· 18

18 votes on parts of the text: 18 adopted

  1. Vote 2:Separate vote on paragraph 1

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by The Left

  2. Vote 3:Paragraph 1 — part 2

    B10-0386/2026 – § 1/2

    Adopted 478 for, 117 against, 11 abstained

    13:26

    Split vote by The Left

    those words

  3. Vote 6:Separate vote on paragraph 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by The Left, Greens

  4. Vote 7:Paragraph 2 — part 2

    B10-0386/2026 – § 2/2

    Adopted 461 for, 130 against, 15 abstained

    13:27

    Split vote by The Left, Greens

    ‘and, in the light of the evaluation, considers that this requires an ambitious, targeted and timely revision;’

  5. Vote 9:Paragraph 4 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by The Left, Greens

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘, particularly in mixed fisheries and in situations where choke species generate disproportionate socio-economic consequences;’, ‘alongside greater flexibility,’ and ‘, exchanges between Member States and producer organisations,’

  6. Vote 10:Paragraph 4 — part 2

    B10-0386/2026 – § 4/2

    Adopted 499 for, 95 against, 19 abstained

    13:28

    Split vote by The Left, Greens

    ‘, particularly in mixed fisheries and in situations where choke species generate disproportionate socio-economic consequences;’

  7. Vote 11:Paragraph 4 — part 3

    B10-0386/2026 – § 4/3

    Adopted 474 for, 126 against, 12 abstained

    13:28

    Split vote by The Left, Greens

    ‘alongside greater flexibility,’

  8. Vote 12:Paragraph 4 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by The Left, Greens

    ‘, particularly in mixed fisheries and in situations where choke species generate disproportionate socio-economic consequences;’

  9. Vote 13:Separate vote on paragraph 5

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Greens

  10. Vote 14:Paragraph 5 — part 2

    B10-0386/2026 – § 5/2

    Adopted 479 for, 124 against, 8 abstained

    13:28

    Split vote by Greens

    ‘and renewal’

  11. Vote 15:Paragraph 5 — part 3

    B10-0386/2026 – § 5/3

    Adopted 489 for, 116 against, 9 abstained

    13:28

    Split vote by Greens

    ‘and to revise the fishing-capacity framework’

  12. Vote 16:Paragraph 5 — part 4

    B10-0386/2026 – § 5/4

    Adopted 478 for, 126 against, 10 abstained

    13:28

    Split vote by Greens

    ‘, renewal’

  13. Vote 17:Separate vote on paragraph 12

    B10-0386/2026 – § 12

    Adopted 475 for, 121 against, 8 abstained

    13:29

    Roll call requested by Greens · separate vote by The Left

  14. Vote 18:Paragraph 13 — part 1

    B10-0386/2026 – § 13/1

    Adopted 490 for, 120 against, 3 abstained

    13:29

    Roll call requested by Greens, EPP · split vote by EPP, The Left

    The part voted on

    ‘Calls on the Commission to review and simplify the implementation of the Fisheries Control Regulation, including reporting obligations, digital traceability requirements, catch registration procedures, weighing rules and electronic monitoring systems, ensuring that control measures remain proportionate, operationally feasible and adapted to the realities of fishing activities;’ without the words ‘the implementation of’

  15. Vote 19:Paragraph 13 — part 2

    B10-0386/2026 – § 13/2

    Adopted 275 for, 270 against, 64 abstained

    13:29

    Roll call requested by Greens, EPP · split vote by EPP, The Left

    ‘the implementation of’

  16. Vote 20:Paragraph 13 — part 3

    B10-0386/2026 – § 13/3

    Adopted 582 for, 10 against, 13 abstained

    13:29

    Roll call requested by Greens, EPP · split vote by EPP, The Left

    The part voted on

    ‘calls on the Commission to address practical and technical implementation issues relating to the CATCH digital certificate, through appropriate clarification, harmonisation and technical adjustments;’

  17. Vote 21:Separate vote on paragraph 20

    B10-0386/2026 – § 20

    Adopted 480 for, 116 against, 19 abstained

    13:30

    Roll call requested by Greens · separate vote by The Left

  18. Vote 22:Separate vote on paragraph 22

    B10-0386/2026 – § 22

    Adopted 452 for, 119 against, 39 abstained

    13:30

    Roll call requested by Greens, The Left

· 1

  1. Vote 24:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote

    B10-0386/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

    Adopted 368 for, 172 against, 69 abstained

    13:30

    Roll call requested by EPP

Alternative motions · 3

  1. Vote 25:Alternative motion for a resolution

    B10-0387/2026

    Lapsed show of hands

  2. Vote 26:Alternative motion for a resolution

    B10-0388/2026

    Lapsed show of hands

  3. Vote 27:Alternative motion for a resolution

    B10-0389/2026

    Lapsed show of hands

← Back to the decision