Paragraph 4 — part 2
Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up
B10-0386/2026 – § 4/2
Adopted
- For
- 499
- Against
- 95
- Abstained
- 19
roll-call vote at 13:28 · 81% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by The Left, Greens
The part voted on: ‘, particularly in mixed fisheries and in situations where choke species generate disproportionate socio-economic consequences;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 21 | 7 | 9 | 37 | Divided |
| Greens | 3 | 46 | 0 | 49 | Against |
| S&D | 88 | 25 | 1 | 114 | For |
| Renew | 58 | 8 | 1 | 67 | For |
| EPP | 155 | 2 | 0 | 157 | For |
| ECR | 70 | 1 | 3 | 74 | For |
| Patriots | 68 | 0 | 0 | 68 | For |
| ESN | 23 | 0 | 2 | 25 | For |
| No group | 13 | 6 | 3 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
613 MEPs voted. Open a group, or filter above.
The Left 37 MEPs
Greens 49 MEPs
S&D 114 MEPs
Renew 67 MEPs
EPP 157 MEPs
ECR 74 MEPs
Patriots 68 MEPs
ESN 25 MEPs
No group 22 MEPs
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.