Amendment 9 to paragraph 64
Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure
A10-0212/2026 – Rasa Juknevičienė – § 64 – Am 9
Rejected
- For
- 205
- Against
- 442
- Abstained
- 10
roll-call vote at 14:23 · 31% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 1 | 38 | 0 | 39 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 49 | 0 | 49 | Against |
| S&D | 6 | 121 | 2 | 129 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 72 | 0 | 72 | Against |
| EPP | 11 | 151 | 4 | 166 | Against |
| ECR | 75 | 0 | 0 | 75 | For |
| Patriots | 76 | 0 | 0 | 76 | For |
| ESN | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | For |
| No group | 11 | 11 | 4 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
39 MEPs of 657 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.