Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Plenary session of 14–17 Sept, day 3 of 4

Wednesday 16 September 2026

19 decisions · 19 passed · 83 · 14:11–14:49

AI:The day in brief

A day of decisions on defence readiness, EU programmes and international agreements, with Parliament setting its position on several laws and adopting resolutions on security and health.

Written by AI from the day's votes · counts are the official record · Report a problem

New EU laws · 7

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

  1. Economy & single market, New EU law

    Decision 1:Simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and simplification of security and defence procurement (Omnibus V)

    Report by Pekka Toveri, Anna-Maja Henriksson ·

    Passed 549 for · 92 against · 27 abstained by an overwhelming majority

  2. Economy & single market, New EU law

    Decision 2:Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V)

    Report by Lucia Yar, Henrik Dahl ·

    Passed 540 for · 105 against · 22 abstained by an overwhelming majority

    AI summary:This is Parliament's first reading position, and it usually needs to agree with the Council before the law is final.

  3. Foreign affairs, New EU law

    Decision 3:Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V)

    Report by Sven Mikser, Pierfrancesco Maran, Aura Salla ·

    Passed 530 for · 125 against · 12 abstained by a large majority

    AI summary:Parliament set out its position on a proposed regulation that amends several existing EU laws on chemicals so as to remove regulatory and administrative burdens for defence readiness and speed up approval and authorisation procedures for the defence industry.

  4. Economy & single market, New EU law

    Decision 4:Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034

    Report by Adnan Dibrani ·

    Passed 496 for · 53 against · 125 abstained by a large majority

    AI summary:The Commission proposed a regulation establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034, which would bring together four existing programmes under one consolidated framework supporting the Single Market, the Customs Union, tax cooperation and the fight against fraud.

  5. Energy, New EU law

    Decision 5:Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation 2028-2034

    Report by Sophie Wilmès ·

    Passed 600 for · 21 against · 48 abstained by an overwhelming majority

    AI summary:The proposal sets up the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation and Decommissioning for 2028-2034, replacing two existing Euratom regulations and merging nuclear safety cooperation with the decommissioning of the Commission's Joint Research Centre nuclear sites.

  6. Energy, New EU law

    Decision 6:Nuclear decommissioning assistance programme of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania for the period 2028-2034

    Report by Virginijus Sinkevičius ·

    Passed 625 for · 20 against · 22 abstained by an overwhelming majority

  7. Trade & customs, New EU law

    Decision 7:Establishing the Union Customs Code and the European Union Customs Authority

    Committee report ·

    Approved without a vote Approved without a vote — nobody moved to reject or amend the Council’s position, so nothing was counted.

    AI summary:The draft law would set up a Union Customs Code and a European Union Customs Authority, and would repeal an earlier regulation on the same subject.

Objections to Commission measures · 4

Parliament can object to technical rules the Commission adopts on its own. Against a delegated act an adopted objection is a veto; against most implementing measures (such as GMO authorisations) it is a call on the Commission to withdraw the measure, which is not legally binding.

  1. Agriculture, food & fisheries, Objection to a Commission measure

    Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure

    Decision 12:Genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6

    Motion for a resolution

    Objection passed On the objection: 442 for · 184 against · 12 abstained by a large majority

    AI summary:The text concerns a draft Commission decision to allow products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6 onto the market under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.

  2. Agriculture, food & fisheries, Objection to a Commission measure

    Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure

    Decision 13:Genetically modified soybean MON 94313

    Motion for a resolution

    Objection passed On the objection: 457 for · 184 against · 10 abstained by a large majority

    AI summary:By adopting the text, Parliament made it its official position, stating that the draft decision exceeds the Commission's implementing powers and is not consistent with Union law.

  3. Agriculture, food & fisheries, Objection to a Commission measure

    Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure

    Decision 14:Genetically modified maize MON 87460

    Motion for a resolution

    Objection passed On the objection: 433 for · 159 against · 10 abstained by a large majority

    AI summary:Parliament considers that the draft decision exceeds the Commission's implementing powers and is not consistent with Union law, and it calls on the Commission to withdraw the draft decision.

  4. Agriculture, food & fisheries, Objection to a Commission measure

    Objection under Rule 115(2), (3), and (4)(c) · implementing measure

    Decision 15:Maximum residue levels for flupyradifurone

    Motion for a resolution

    Objection passed On the objection: 383 for · 278 against · 9 abstained by a clear majority

    Electronic vote: totals recorded, but not how each MEP voted.

    AI summary:Parliament considered a draft Commission regulation that would change maximum residue levels for several pesticides, including flupyradifurone, in or on certain products.

Resolutions & reports · 4

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

  1. Foreign affairs, Resolution

    Decision 16:Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure

    Report by Rasa Juknevičienė

    Adopted 470 for · 129 against · 62 abstained by a large majority

    AI summary:The report describes hybrid attacks such as drone incursions, airspace violations, sabotage of undersea cables and energy infrastructure, cyberattacks, GPS jamming and foreign information manipulation and interference.

  2. Health, Resolution

    Decision 17:An EU cardiovascular diseases strategy

    Report by Romana Jerković

    Adopted 545 for · 47 against · 75 abstained by an overwhelming majority

    AI summary:The resolution addresses cardiovascular diseases, which remain the leading cause of death in the EU, and the modifiable risk factors behind most cardiovascular deaths, such as tobacco use, harmful alcohol consumption, unhealthy diets, physical inactivity and environmental exposures.

  3. Health, Resolution

    Decision 18:Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

    Report by Billy Kelleher

    Adopted 390 for · 218 against · 29 abstained by a clear majority

    AI summary:The text examines the whole healthcare cycle, from clinical trials and drug development to diagnosis and treatment, and sets out Parliament's official position.

  4. EU institutions & Parliament, Appointment

    Decision 19:Partial renewal of Members of the Court of Auditors – Gerald Loacker

    Committee report

    Appointment approved 331 for · 282 against · 30 abstained by a small majority

    Electronic vote: totals recorded, but not how each MEP voted.

    AI summary:Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control evaluated his credentials, receiving his curriculum vitae and written questionnaire replies, and held a hearing with him.