Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final., Economy & single market
Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034
Passed by a large majority
Parliament adopted its position on the law.
- For
- 496
- Against
- 53
- Abstained
- 125
roll-call vote at 14:16 · 74% of votes cast in favour
Committee report by Adnan Dibrani · Parliament’s first vote on a proposed EU law. It sets Parliament’s position for negotiations with the Council. · Report A-10-2026-0216
AI:What this decision does
The Commission proposed a regulation establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034, which would bring together four existing programmes under one consolidated framework supporting the Single Market, the Customs Union, tax cooperation and the fight against fraud.§1: source passage in the text Parliament adopted its position at first reading on this proposal, setting out its amendments to the text.§1: source passage in the text Parliament called on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal, and instructed its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.§1: source passage in the text
Written by AI from the text voted on · counts are the official record · Read the text · Report a problem
How the groups voted
For: The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP; Against: ESN; Abstained: ECR; Divided: Patriots
- The Left For 36 for, 1 against, 3 abstainedof 44
- Greens For 50 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 53
- S&D For 131 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 135
- Renew For 73 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 78
- EPP For 173 for, 0 against, 2 abstainedof 184
- ECR Abstained 10 for, 3 against, 63 abstainedof 84
- Patriots Divided 7 for, 19 against, 51 abstainedof 85
- ESN Against 0 for, 24 against, 1 abstainedof 27
- No group not a group 16 for, 6 against, 5 abstainedof 28
Groups from left to right · for–against–abstained, of the group’s MEPs
A group is shown as divided when no position has two thirds of its votes.
Did not vote with their group
20 MEPs voted differently from their group’s clear line (two thirds of its votes).
The Left voted for (36 of 40). Against: 1, Abstained: 3
Giorgos Georgiou (Cyprus, abstained), Irene Montero (Spain, abstained), João Oliveira (Portugal, against), Marc Botenga (Belgium, abstained)
EPP voted for (173 of 175). Abstained: 2
David Casa (Malta), Peter Agius (Malta)
ECR abstained (63 of 76). For: 10, Against: 3
Alexandr Vondra (Czechia, for), Assita Kanko (Belgium, for), Aurelijus Veryga (Lithuania, for), Emmanouil Fragkos (Greece, against), Galato Alexandraki (Greece, against)
8 more from ECR
Jaak Madison (Estonia, for), Kris van Dijck (Belgium, for), Nikola Bartůšek (Czechia, for), Ondřej Krutílek (Czechia, for), Reinis Pozņaks (Latvia, for), Rihards Kols (Latvia, for), Sebastian Tynkkynen (Finland, against), Veronika Vrecionová (Czechia, for)
ESN voted against (24 of 25). Abstained: 1
Sarah Knafo (France)
Groups as they are now; members who changed group are compared with their current one.
Find an MEP
Opens the list of MEPs on the vote page, filtered to the country you pick.
How it got here
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 amendments (3 rejected) and 7 parts of the text voted on separately (7 adopted). Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.