Paragraph 48 — part 10
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 48/10
Adopted
- For
- 474
- Against
- 123
- Abstained
- 16
roll-call vote at 13:50 · 77% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Greens, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘underlining that housing projects that pass into private hands are also legitimate;’ ‘stresses that Member States should be free to choose how to manage these projects in line with their national policies;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 33 | 3 | 36 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 46 | 1 | 47 | Against |
| S&D | 101 | 12 | 7 | 120 | For |
| Renew | 69 | 0 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 158 | 2 | 0 | 160 | For |
| ECR | 65 | 1 | 1 | 67 | For |
| Patriots | 65 | 1 | 0 | 66 | For |
| ESN | 3 | 19 | 1 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 13 | 9 | 3 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 613 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.