Paragraph 42 — part 3
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 42/3
Adopted
- For
- 454
- Against
- 141
- Abstained
- 24
roll-call vote at 13:45 · 73% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by Greens
The part voted on: ‘welcomes, in this regard, the review of the EU securitisation framework presented by the Commission on 17 June 2025 with the aim of freeing up banks’ balance sheets and enhancing banks’ lending capacity; calls on the Commission to assess the impact of the Capital Requirements Regulation on small construction companies, in order to ensure that loans for residential projects are dealt with in a proportional manner, reflecting the fact that lower systemic risk projects are often pre-sold, insured or guaranteed by public authorities;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 37 | 1 | 38 | Against |
| Greens | 1 | 41 | 4 | 46 | Against |
| S&D | 100 | 16 | 3 | 119 | For |
| Renew | 69 | 0 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 159 | 0 | 0 | 159 | For |
| ECR | 71 | 1 | 0 | 72 | For |
| Patriots | 41 | 16 | 8 | 65 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 20 | 5 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 13 | 10 | 3 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
65 MEPs of 619 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.