Paragraph 30 — part 2
Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
A10-0025/2026 – Borja Giménez Larraz – § 30/2
Adopted
- For
- 452
- Against
- 86
- Abstained
- 81
roll-call vote at 13:38 · 73% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots, S&D · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘underlines, therefore, the need to guarantee fair wages, stable employment, safe working conditions, improved contracts, and health and safety standards; stresses that workers’ rights should be respected and enforced, and encourages effective monitoring, including the use of digital tools and company registers to detect fraud; calls for national measures to prevent accidents at construction sites; calls for strengthening the implementation of the EU occupational safety and health acquis; calls for the Member States to improve collective bargaining for workers in the construction and renovation sectors;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 39 | 0 | 0 | 39 | For |
| Greens | 47 | 0 | 0 | 47 | For |
| S&D | 122 | 0 | 0 | 122 | For |
| Renew | 64 | 2 | 2 | 68 | For |
| EPP | 152 | 1 | 3 | 156 | For |
| ECR | 1 | 15 | 57 | 73 | Abstained |
| Patriots | 10 | 46 | 9 | 65 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 19 | 6 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 17 | 3 | 4 | 24 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
39 MEPs of 619 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.