Amendment 29, after paragraph 10
The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – After § 10 – Am 29
Rejected
- For
- 135
- Against
- 471
- Abstained
- 52
roll-call vote at 12:53 · 21% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ESN
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 39 | 0 | 39 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 51 | 0 | 51 | Against |
| S&D | 2 | 122 | 0 | 124 | Against |
| Renew | 1 | 63 | 2 | 66 | Against |
| EPP | 1 | 176 | 1 | 178 | Against |
| ECR | 71 | 0 | 0 | 71 | For |
| Patriots | 32 | 0 | 47 | 79 | Divided |
| ESN | 23 | 1 | 0 | 24 | For |
| No group | 5 | 19 | 2 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
39 MEPs of 658 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.