Amendment 7 — part 2 to paragraph 10
The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – § 10 – Am 7/2
Rejected
- For
- 103
- Against
- 500
- Abstained
- 61
roll-call vote at 12:53 · 16% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘in that regard, considers that the proposal on the 28th regime should be accompanied by additional measures, such as a social non-regression clause, in order to avoid the circumvention or weakening of more protective social rules applicable in the country of origin; insists that strong and effective safeguards be set out by way of substantive rules which have a high level of protection;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 39 | 0 | 0 | 39 | For |
| Greens | 16 | 1 | 34 | 51 | Abstained |
| S&D | 28 | 97 | 0 | 125 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 67 | 0 | 67 | Against |
| EPP | 0 | 181 | 0 | 181 | Against |
| ECR | 0 | 70 | 2 | 72 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 72 | 7 | 79 | Against |
| ESN | 1 | 9 | 14 | 24 | Divided |
| No group | 19 | 3 | 4 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
664 MEPs voted. Open a group, or filter above.
The Left 39 MEPs
Greens 51 MEPs
S&D 125 MEPs
Renew 67 MEPs
EPP 181 MEPs
ECR 72 MEPs
Patriots 79 MEPs
ESN 24 MEPs
No group 26 MEPs
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.