Every vote on this decision
The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies
36 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published., where every MEP’s position is recorded.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 15 amendments (15 rejected) and 20 parts of the text voted on separately (1 adopted, 19 rejected).
A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. · 20
20 votes on parts of the text: 1 adopted, 19 rejected
-
Vote 1:Separate vote on paragraph 1
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 4:Separate vote on paragraph 2
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 6:Separate vote on paragraph 5
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 7:Separate vote on paragraph 7
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 8:Separate vote on paragraph 10
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 11:Separate vote on paragraph 11
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 12:Separate vote on paragraph 12
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 13:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 14
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 15:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 14
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 16:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 14
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 18:Separate vote on paragraph 15
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 19:Separate vote on paragraph 17
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 20:Separate vote on paragraph 20
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 21:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 20
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 22:Separate vote on paragraph 27
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 23:Separate vote on paragraph 29
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 25:Separate vote on paragraph 35
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 26:Separate vote on paragraph 36
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 27:Separate vote on subheading 6
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 33:Separate vote on citation 2
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – Citation 2
Adopted 491 for, 139 against, 20 abstained
12:57Roll call requested by Patriots
A proposed change to the text, voted on before the final vote. · 15
-
Vote 2:Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – After § 1 – Am 3
Rejected 116 for, 489 against, 56 abstained
12:52Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 3:Amendment 33 to paragraph 2
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – § 2 – Am 33
Rejected 196 for, 446 against, 15 abstained
12:52Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 5:Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 2
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – After § 2 – Am 28
Rejected 190 for, 454 against, 16 abstained
12:53Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 9:Amendment 7 to paragraph 10 — part 2
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – § 10 – Am 7/2
Rejected 103 for, 500 against, 61 abstained
12:53Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on
‘in that regard, considers that the proposal on the 28th regime should be accompanied by additional measures, such as a social non-regression clause, in order to avoid the circumvention or weakening of more protective social rules applicable in the country of origin; insists that strong and effective safeguards be set out by way of substantive rules which have a high level of protection;’
-
Vote 10:Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 10
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – After § 10 – Am 29
Rejected 135 for, 471 against, 52 abstained
12:53Roll call requested by ESN
-
Vote 14:Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 14
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – After § 14 – Am 11
Rejected 78 for, 528 against, 58 abstained
12:54Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 17:Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 14
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – After § 14 – Am 14
Rejected 81 for, 518 against, 56 abstained
12:54Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 24:Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 29
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – After § 29 – Am 21
Rejected 79 for, 561 against, 15 abstained
12:55Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 28:Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – § 37 – Am 25D= 34D=
Rejected 191 for, 423 against, 48 abstained
12:55Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 29:Amendment 26 to paragraph 40
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – § 40 – Am 26D
Rejected 136 for, 487 against, 24 abstained
12:56Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 30:Amendment 35 to paragraph 40
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – § 40 – Am 35
Rejected 124 for, 500 against, 28 abstained
12:56Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 31:Amendment 27 to paragraph 41
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – § 41 – Am 27D
Rejected 162 for, 484 against, 18 abstained
12:56Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 32:Amendment 30 to citation 2
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – Citation 2 – Am 30
Rejected 199 for, 445 against, 10 abstained
12:56Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 34:Amendment 31, adding text after recital C
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – After recital C – Am 31
Rejected 193 for, 464 against, 3 abstained
12:57Roll call requested by The Left, Patriots
-
Vote 35:Amendment 32, adding text after recital E
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – After recital E – Am 32
Rejected 190 for, 450 against, 13 abstained
12:57Roll call requested by Patriots
The last vote on a text as a whole, after all amendments. It decides whether the text is adopted. · 1
-
Vote 36:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted 492 for, 144 against, 28 abstained
12:57