Amendment 7 — part 2 to paragraph 10
The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – § 10 – Am 7/2
Rejected
- For
- 103
- Against
- 500
- Abstained
- 61
roll-call vote at 12:53 · 16% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘in that regard, considers that the proposal on the 28th regime should be accompanied by additional measures, such as a social non-regression clause, in order to avoid the circumvention or weakening of more protective social rules applicable in the country of origin; insists that strong and effective safeguards be set out by way of substantive rules which have a high level of protection;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 39 | 0 | 0 | 39 | For |
| Greens | 16 | 1 | 34 | 51 | Abstained |
| S&D | 28 | 97 | 0 | 125 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 67 | 0 | 67 | Against |
| EPP | 0 | 181 | 0 | 181 | Against |
| ECR | 0 | 70 | 2 | 72 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 72 | 7 | 79 | Against |
| ESN | 1 | 9 | 14 | 24 | Divided |
| No group | 19 | 3 | 4 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
72 MEPs of 664 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.