Paragraph 49 — part 3
Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024
A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49/3
Adopted
- For
- 386
- Against
- 214
- Abstained
- 64
roll-call vote at 14:12 · 58% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Patriots, ECR
The part voted on: ‘recalls that the EU Treaty framework already allows a number of different institutional forms of cooperation in the field of foreign, security and defence policy and notes with regret that the potential for fast action in this field, as provided for in the ‘passerelle clauses’ of the TEU, has been used only in a very limited manner; calls on the Council to consider all possibilities to strengthen and deepen its process for decision-making on the CFSP/CSDP with a view to realising the untapped potential within the Treaties; reiterates its call for the Council to gradually switch to qualified majority voting for decisions on the CFSP and CSDP, at least in those areas that do not have military implications; suggests, furthermore, that the Council pursue making full use of the ‘passerelle clauses’ and the scope of articles that enhance EU solidarity and mutual assistance in the event of crises;’ without the words: ‘reiterates its call for the Council to gradually switch to qualified majority voting for decisions on the CFSP and CSDP, at least in those areas that do not have military implications;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 2 | 40 | 2 | 44 | Against |
| Greens | 50 | 1 | 0 | 51 | For |
| S&D | 113 | 11 | 4 | 128 | For |
| Renew | 65 | 5 | 0 | 70 | For |
| EPP | 151 | 16 | 5 | 172 | For |
| ECR | 3 | 27 | 45 | 75 | Divided |
| Patriots | 0 | 79 | 0 | 79 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 23 | 1 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 2 | 12 | 7 | 21 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
44 MEPs of 664 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.