Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024

178 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 38 amendments (9 adopted, 29 rejected) and 139 parts of the text voted on separately (75 adopted, 58 rejected, 6 lapsed).

· 139

139 votes on parts of the text: 75 adopted, 58 rejected, 6 lapsed or other

  1. Vote 1:Separate vote on paragraph 1

    Rejected show of hands

  2. Vote 2:Amendment 65 — part 1 of 2

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 1 – Am 65

    Rejected 237 for, 416 against, 12 abstained

    14:01

    Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    ‘Stresses the seriousness of the threats to the security of the European continent, which have reached a level unprecedented since the Second World War; expresses deep concern at the rise of geopolitical fractures, new and renewed imperialist ambitions for domination by authoritarian powers, systemic rivalry of great powers, nationalist unilateralism, the spread of terrorism, including extremist right wing and jihadist terrorism,’

  3. Vote 3:Amendment 65 — part 2 of 2

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 1 – Am 65

    Adopted 448 for, 169 against, 42 abstained

    14:02

    Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    ‘forced displacement of civilians and deliberate targeting of civilian persons and infrastructure, and the primary and growing use of force and violence by certain malicious actors to promote their political and economic objectives and interests or to resolve disputes;’

  4. Vote 4:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 1

    Adopted show of hands

  5. Vote 6:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 1

    Rejected show of hands

  6. Vote 9:Separate vote on paragraph 3

    Rejected show of hands

  7. Vote 10:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 3

    Adopted show of hands

  8. Vote 11:Separate vote on paragraph 4

    Rejected show of hands

  9. Vote 13:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 4

    Rejected show of hands

  10. Vote 14:Separate vote on paragraph 5

    Rejected show of hands

  11. Vote 15:Separate vote on paragraph 5

    Rejected show of hands

  12. Vote 16:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 5

    Rejected show of hands

  13. Vote 17:Separate vote on paragraph 7

    Rejected show of hands

  14. Vote 18:Separate vote on paragraph 7

    Rejected show of hands

  15. Vote 19:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 7

    Adopted show of hands

  16. Vote 20:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 7

    Adopted show of hands

  17. Vote 22:Separate vote on paragraph 8

    Rejected show of hands

  18. Vote 23:Separate vote on paragraph 9

    Adopted show of hands

  19. Vote 25:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 9

    Adopted show of hands

  20. Vote 26:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 9

    Adopted show of hands

  21. Vote 28:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 9

    Adopted show of hands

  22. Vote 30:Separate vote on paragraph 10

    Adopted show of hands

  23. Vote 33:Separate vote on paragraph 10

    Lapsed no count

  24. Vote 34:Separate vote on paragraph 10

    Adopted show of hands

  25. Vote 35:Separate vote on paragraph 10

    Rejected show of hands

  26. Vote 36:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 10

    Rejected show of hands

  27. Vote 37:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 10

    Rejected show of hands

  28. Vote 39:Separate vote on paragraph 11

    Rejected show of hands

  29. Vote 40:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 12

    Adopted show of hands

  30. Vote 41:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 12

    Adopted show of hands

  31. Vote 42:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 12

    Adopted show of hands

  32. Vote 43:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 12

    Adopted show of hands

  33. Vote 44:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 12

    Rejected show of hands

  34. Vote 46:Separate vote on paragraph 13

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ECR, EPP

  35. Vote 47:Separate vote on paragraph 13

    Rejected show of hands

    Split vote by ECR, EPP

  36. Vote 48:Separate vote on paragraph 13

    Lapsed show of hands

    Split vote by ECR, EPP

  37. Vote 49:Separate vote on paragraph 13

    Lapsed show of hands

    Split vote by ECR, EPP

  38. Vote 50:Separate vote on paragraph 13

    Lapsed show of hands

    Split vote by ECR, EPP

  39. Vote 51:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 13

    Adopted show of hands

  40. Vote 52:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 13

    Adopted show of hands

  41. Vote 53:Separate vote on paragraph 14

    Rejected show of hands

  42. Vote 54:Separate vote on paragraph 15

    Adopted 319 for, 283 against, 65 abstained

  43. Vote 55:Separate vote on paragraph 15

    Rejected show of hands

  44. Vote 56:Separate vote on paragraph 17

    Rejected show of hands

  45. Vote 59:Separate vote on paragraph 18

    Rejected show of hands

  46. Vote 61:Separate vote on paragraph 19

    Rejected show of hands

  47. Vote 62:Separate vote on paragraph 20

    Rejected show of hands

  48. Vote 63:Separate vote on paragraph 21

    Rejected show of hands

  49. Vote 64:Separate vote on paragraph 22

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by ESN

  50. Vote 65:Separate vote on paragraph 24

    Rejected show of hands

  51. Vote 69:Separate vote on paragraph 26

    Rejected show of hands

  52. Vote 70:Separate vote on paragraph 27

    Rejected show of hands

  53. Vote 71:Separate vote on paragraph 29

    Rejected 265 for, 298 against, 104 abstained

    Separate vote by ECR

  54. Vote 72:Separate vote on paragraph 29

    Rejected show of hands

    Separate vote by ECR

  55. Vote 73:Separate vote on paragraph 29

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by ECR

  56. Vote 74:Separate vote on paragraph 30

    Adopted 340 for, 288 against, 43 abstained

  57. Vote 75:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 30

    Adopted show of hands

  58. Vote 77:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 32

    Rejected show of hands

  59. Vote 78:Separate vote on paragraph 33

    Rejected show of hands

  60. Vote 80:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 40

    Adopted show of hands

  61. Vote 81:Separate vote on paragraph 42

    Adopted show of hands

  62. Vote 82:Separate vote on paragraph 43

    Adopted show of hands

  63. Vote 84:Separate vote on paragraph 47

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by Patriots

  64. Vote 88:Paragraph 49 — part 1

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49/1

    Adopted 398 for, 249 against, 18 abstained

    14:12

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Patriots, ECR

    ‘Reaffirms that, in order to become a credible geopolitical player, the EU should reform its process for decision-making on the CFSP/CSDP’

  65. Vote 89:Paragraph 49 — part 2

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49/2

    Adopted 373 for, 275 against, 12 abstained

    14:12

    Roll call requested by EPP, Patriots · split vote by Patriots, ECR

    ‘and underlines, in this regard, that institutional reflections on lifting the requirement for unanimity in this process should be considered;’

  66. Vote 90:Paragraph 49 — part 3

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49/3

    Adopted 386 for, 214 against, 64 abstained

    14:12

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Patriots, ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘recalls that the EU Treaty framework already allows a number of different institutional forms of cooperation in the field of foreign, security and defence policy and notes with regret that the potential for fast action in this field, as provided for in the ‘passerelle clauses’ of the TEU, has been used only in a very limited manner; calls on the Council to consider all possibilities to strengthen and deepen its process for decision-making on the CFSP/CSDP with a view to realising the untapped potential within the Treaties; reiterates its call for the Council to gradually switch to qualified majority voting for decisions on the CFSP and CSDP, at least in those areas that do not have military implications; suggests, furthermore, that the Council pursue making full use of the ‘passerelle clauses’ and the scope of articles that enhance EU solidarity and mutual assistance in the event of crises;’ without the words: ‘reiterates its call for the Council to gradually switch to qualified majority voting for decisions on the CFSP and CSDP, at least in those areas that do not have military implications;’

  67. Vote 91:Paragraph 49 — part 4

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49/4

    Adopted 369 for, 269 against, 23 abstained

    14:12

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Patriots, ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘reiterates its call for the Council to gradually switch to qualified majority voting for decisions on the CFSP and CSDP, at least in those areas that do not have military implications;’

  68. Vote 92:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 53

    Adopted show of hands

  69. Vote 93:Paragraph 54 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘all EU Member States should urgently reach a level of defence spending, as a proportion of their GDP, that is significantly higher than NATO’s current target of 2 %;’

  70. Vote 94:Paragraph 54 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    those words

  71. Vote 95:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 55

    Adopted show of hands

  72. Vote 96:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 55

    Adopted show of hands

  73. Vote 97:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 55

    Adopted show of hands

  74. Vote 99:Separate vote on paragraph 56

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Renew, EPP

  75. Vote 100:Paragraph 56 — part 2

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 56/2

    Adopted 481 for, 112 against, 74 abstained

    14:13

    Roll call requested by Renew · split vote by Renew, EPP

    those words

  76. Vote 101:Separate vote on paragraph 57

    Rejected 176 for, 422 against, 61 abstained

  77. Vote 104:Separate vote on paragraph 59

    Rejected show of hands

  78. Vote 105:Separate vote on paragraph 66

    Adopted 319 for, 316 against, 12 abstained

  79. Vote 107:Separate vote on paragraph 68

    Adopted show of hands

  80. Vote 108:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 68

    Adopted show of hands

  81. Vote 109:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 68

    Rejected show of hands

  82. Vote 111:Paragraph 69 — part 1 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ECR, EPP

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘expresses serious concern, furthermore, about the ongoing military action by the Israeli Defence Forces in the Gaza Strip and in the West Bank; condemns the Israeli Defence Forces firing on the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), which is a grave violation of international law;’ and ‘reaffirms the essential stabilising role played by UNIFIL, to which 16 Member States contribute, in southern Lebanon; calls for immediate ceasefires in both Gaza and Lebanon, an end to the hostilities, the full and symmetrical implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701(2006) and the protection of the civilian populations;’

  83. Vote 112:Paragraph 69 — part 2 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ECR, EPP

    The part voted on

    ‘expresses serious concern, furthermore, about the ongoing military action by the Israeli Defence Forces in the Gaza Strip and in the West Bank; condemns the Israeli Defence Forces firing on the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), which is a grave violation of international law;’

  84. Vote 113:Paragraph 69 — part 3 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ECR, EPP

    The part voted on

    ‘reaffirms the essential stabilising role played by UNIFIL, to which 16 Member States contribute, in southern Lebanon; calls for immediate ceasefires in both Gaza and Lebanon, an end to the hostilities, the full and symmetrical implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701(2006) and the protection of the civilian populations;’

  85. Vote 114:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 69

    Adopted show of hands

  86. Vote 115:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 74

    Adopted show of hands

  87. Vote 116:Separate vote on paragraph 75

    Rejected show of hands

  88. Vote 117:Separate vote on paragraph 75

    Rejected show of hands

  89. Vote 118:Paragraph 77 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘make ties with the new Syrian regime conditional on Russia’s full withdrawal from the country and prevent Russia from establishing new military bases elsewhere in the region; recognises, in this regard, the EU’s significant leverage with regard to Syria in terms of political recognition, the easing of sanctions, trade agreements, and financial support for reconstruction,’

  90. Vote 119:Paragraph 77 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Patriots

    those words

  91. Vote 120:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 83

    Adopted show of hands

  92. Vote 121:Separate vote on paragraph 85

    Adopted show of hands

  93. Vote 122:Separate vote on paragraph 88

    Adopted show of hands

  94. Vote 123:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 88

    Adopted show of hands

  95. Vote 124:Separate vote on paragraph 90

    Adopted show of hands

  96. Vote 125:Separate vote on paragraph 92

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ECR

  97. Vote 126:Paragraph 92 — part 2

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 92/2

    Adopted 458 for, 127 against, 75 abstained

    14:16

    Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR

    those words

  98. Vote 127:Separate vote on paragraph 98

    Rejected show of hands

  99. Vote 128:Separate vote on paragraph 102

    Adopted show of hands

  100. Vote 129:Separate vote on paragraph 113

    Rejected show of hands

  101. Vote 132:Paragraph 118 — part 1 of 2

    Lapsed show of hands

    Split vote by Greens

    ‘Condemns the continued malicious actions by Russia and Belarus aimed at destabilising the EU’

  102. Vote 133:Paragraph 118 — part 2 of 2

    Lapsed show of hands

    Split vote by Greens

    The part voted on

    ‘by pushing migrants to forcibly enter EU countries, constituting a hybrid attack; calls on the EU to review and update its policies concerning the strengthening of its external borders in order to bolster the security of the Union as a whole;’

  103. Vote 134:Separate vote on paragraph 124

    Rejected show of hands

  104. Vote 137:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 127

    Adopted show of hands

  105. Vote 138:Separate vote on paragraph 129

    Rejected show of hands

  106. Vote 139:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 129

    Rejected 263 for, 317 against, 83 abstained

  107. Vote 140:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 129

    Adopted 431 for, 178 against, 50 abstained

  108. Vote 141:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 132

    Rejected show of hands

  109. Vote 142:Separate vote on paragraph 135

    Rejected show of hands

  110. Vote 144:Separate vote on paragraph 137

    Rejected show of hands

  111. Vote 145:Separate vote on paragraph 140

    Rejected show of hands

  112. Vote 146:Separate vote on paragraph 140

    Rejected show of hands

  113. Vote 147:Separate vote on paragraph 140

    Rejected show of hands

  114. Vote 148:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 141

    Adopted show of hands

  115. Vote 149:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 141

    Adopted show of hands

  116. Vote 152:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 145

    Rejected show of hands

  117. Vote 153:Separate vote on subheading 28

    Adopted show of hands

  118. Vote 154:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 149

    Adopted show of hands

  119. Vote 155:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 150

    Adopted show of hands

  120. Vote 156:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 150

    Rejected show of hands

  121. Vote 158:Separate vote on paragraph 153

    Adopted show of hands

  122. Vote 159:Separate vote on paragraph 155

    Rejected show of hands

  123. Vote 160:Separate vote on paragraph 158

    Adopted show of hands

  124. Vote 161:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 158

    Adopted show of hands

  125. Vote 163:Separate vote on citation 35

    Adopted show of hands

  126. Vote 164:Vote on text inserted after citation 58

    Adopted show of hands

  127. Vote 165:Separate vote on recital A

    Rejected show of hands

  128. Vote 166:Separate vote on recital B

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by ESN

  129. Vote 167:Vote on text inserted after recital B

    Adopted show of hands

  130. Vote 168:Recital C — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Greens

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘instrumentalisation of migration’

  131. Vote 169:Recital C — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Greens

    those words

  132. Vote 170:Vote on text inserted after recital D

    Adopted show of hands

  133. Vote 171:Separate vote on recital E

    Rejected show of hands

  134. Vote 172:Separate vote on recital L

    Rejected show of hands

  135. Vote 173:Vote on text inserted after recital M

    Rejected show of hands

  136. Vote 174:Vote on text inserted after recital P

    Rejected show of hands

  137. Vote 175:Separate vote on recital X

    Adopted show of hands

  138. Vote 176:Vote on text inserted after recital AA

    Rejected show of hands

  139. Vote 177:Vote on text inserted after recital AC

    Rejected show of hands

· 38

38 amendment votes: 9 adopted, 29 rejected

  1. Vote 5:Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 1

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 1 – Am 66

    Rejected 85 for, 517 against, 63 abstained

    14:02

    Roll call requested by The Left

  2. Vote 7:Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 1

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 1 – Am 68

    Rejected 81 for, 567 against, 14 abstained

    14:02

    Roll call requested by The Left

  3. Vote 8:Amendment 69 to paragraph 2

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 2 – Am 69

    Rejected 112 for, 488 against, 59 abstained

    14:02

    Roll call requested by The Left

  4. Vote 12:Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 4

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 4 – Am 70

    Adopted 512 for, 84 against, 73 abstained

    14:03

    Roll call requested by The Left

  5. Vote 21:Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 7

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 7 – Am 73

    Rejected 224 for, 355 against, 88 abstained

    14:03

    Roll call requested by The Left

  6. Vote 24:Amendment 125 to paragraph 9

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 9 – Am 125

    Rejected 90 for, 534 against, 46 abstained

    14:04

    Roll call requested by ECR

  7. Vote 27:Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 9

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 9 – Am 21

    Adopted 489 for, 108 against, 71 abstained

    14:04

    Roll call requested by ECR

  8. Vote 29:Amendment 1 to paragraph 10

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 10 – Am 1

    Rejected 79 for, 541 against, 40 abstained

    14:04

    Roll call requested by ESN

  9. Vote 31:Amendment 74 to paragraph 10 — part 1

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 10 – Am 74/1

    Rejected 230 for, 424 against, 14 abstained

    14:05

    Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    ‘Calls for the EU and its Member States to accelerate their commitments made in the Versailles Declaration and to assume greater responsibility for their defence and security, including by achieving greater strategic autonomy and bolstering defence and deterrence capabilities, in particular on its eastern borders; expresses dismay concerning the US administration’s policy of appeasing Russia and targeting its allies;’

  10. Vote 32:Amendment 74 to paragraph 10 — part 2

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 10 – Am 74/2

    Rejected 113 for, 483 against, 60 abstained

    14:05

    Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    ‘stresses that NATO and the transatlantic partnership with the United States remain the cornerstones of European collective defence, but are now being undermined by the policies pursued by the United States’

  11. Vote 38:Amendment 77 to paragraph 11

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 11 – Am 77

    Rejected 49 for, 548 against, 65 abstained

    14:05

    Roll call requested by The Left

  12. Vote 45:Amendment 79 to paragraph 13

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 13 – Am 79

    Rejected 113 for, 517 against, 36 abstained

    14:06

    Roll call requested by The Left

  13. Vote 57:Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 17 — part 1

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 17 – Am 30/1

    Adopted 459 for, 120 against, 86 abstained

    14:07

    Roll call requested by ECR, EPP · split vote by ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘Disagrees with the Hungarian Government’s policy towards Russia, its use of vetoes against EU sanctions and its blocking of EU financial and defence aid for Ukraine; believes that the actions of the Hungarian Government undermine unity and solidarity in Europe;’

  14. Vote 58:Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 17 — part 2

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 17 – Am 30/2

    Adopted 494 for, 134 against, 30 abstained

    14:07

    Roll call requested by ECR, EPP · split vote by ECR

    The part voted on

    ‘recalls that, under the EPF, countries are entitled to financial compensation for equipment deliveries to Ukraine and underlines, in the light of this, that the current blocks on reimbursements to 25 Member States, from which Poland stands out with a total of EUR 450 million in unpaid compensation, need to be removed immediately;’

  15. Vote 60:Amendment 137 to paragraph 18

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 18 – Am 137

    Rejected 115 for, 531 against, 22 abstained

    14:08

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  16. Vote 66:Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 24

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 24 – Am 2

    Rejected 183 for, 451 against, 28 abstained

    14:08

    Roll call requested by ECR, ESN

  17. Vote 67:Amendment 84, adding text after paragraph 24

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 24 – Am 84

    Rejected 216 for, 406 against, 39 abstained

    14:08

    Roll call requested by The Left

  18. Vote 68:Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 24

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 24 – Am 119

    Rejected 310 for, 341 against, 18 abstained

    14:09

    Roll call requested by ECR

  19. Vote 76:Amendment 130 to paragraph 31

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 31 – Am 130

    Rejected 187 for, 456 against, 23 abstained

    14:10

    Roll call requested by ECR

  20. Vote 79:Amendment 131 to paragraph 33

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 33 – Am 131

    Rejected 198 for, 444 against, 29 abstained

    14:10

    Roll call requested by ECR

  21. Vote 83:Amendment 132, adding text after paragraph 44

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 44 – Am 132

    Adopted 463 for, 169 against, 37 abstained

    14:11

    Roll call requested by ECR

  22. Vote 85:Amendment 85 to paragraph 49

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49 – Am 85

    Rejected 263 for, 374 against, 31 abstained

    14:11

    Roll call requested by The Left

  23. Vote 86:Amendment 140 to paragraph 49

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49 – Am 140

    Rejected 219 for, 428 against, 14 abstained

    14:11

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  24. Vote 87:Amendment 133 to paragraph 49

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 49 – Am 133

    Rejected 206 for, 442 against, 15 abstained

    14:11

    Roll call requested by ECR

  25. Vote 98:Amendment 141 to paragraph 56

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 56 – Am 141

    Rejected 306 for, 313 against, 26 abstained

    14:13

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  26. Vote 102:Amendment 101, adding text after paragraph 57

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 57 – Am 101

    Adopted 303 for, 289 against, 62 abstained

    14:14

    Roll call requested by Renew

  27. Vote 103:Amendment 121, adding text after paragraph 57

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 57 – Am 121

    Adopted 409 for, 188 against, 66 abstained

    14:14

    Roll call requested by ECR

  28. Vote 106:Amendment 86 to paragraph 68

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 68 – Am 86

    Rejected 118 for, 516 against, 24 abstained

    14:15

    Roll call requested by The Left

  29. Vote 110:Amendment 88 to paragraph 69

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 69 – Am 88

    Rejected 207 for, 445 against, 14 abstained

    14:15

    Roll call requested by The Left

  30. Vote 130:Amendment 122 to paragraph 118 — part 1

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 118 – Am 122/1

    Adopted 361 for, 298 against, 7 abstained

    14:17

    Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    ‘Condemns the continued malicious actions by Russia and Belarus aimed at destabilising the EU by pushing migrants to forcibly enter EU countries, constituting a hybrid attack; calls on the EU to review and update its policies concerning the strengthening of its external borders, including through the funding of physical barriers’

  31. Vote 131:Amendment 122 to paragraph 118 — part 2

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 118 – Am 122/2

    Rejected 224 for, 428 against, 12 abstained

    14:17

    Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by EPP

    ‘and naval blockades, in order to bolster the security of the Union as a whole;’

  32. Vote 135:Amendment 145, adding text after paragraph 124

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 124 – Am 145

    Rejected 113 for, 489 against, 58 abstained

    14:17

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  33. Vote 136:Amendment 146 to paragraph 125

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 125 – Am 146

    Adopted 322 for, 305 against, 7 abstained

    14:17

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  34. Vote 143:Amendment 147 to paragraph 135

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 135 – Am 147

    Rejected 198 for, 457 against, 5 abstained

    14:19

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  35. Vote 150:Amendment 148 to paragraph 143

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 143 – Am 148

    Rejected 279 for, 318 against, 48 abstained

    14:19

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  36. Vote 151:Amendment 96, adding text after paragraph 145

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – After § 145 – Am 96

    Rejected 217 for, 430 against, 11 abstained

    14:20

    Roll call requested by The Left

  37. Vote 157:Amendment 149 to paragraph 151

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – § 151 – Am 149

    Rejected 180 for, 365 against, 116 abstained

    14:20

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  38. Vote 162:Amendment 61, adding text after citation 3

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – after citation 3 – Am 61

    Rejected 105 for, 366 against, 190 abstained

    14:20

    Roll call requested by The Left

· 1

  1. Vote 178:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote

    A10-0011/2025 – Nicolás Pascual de la Parte – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

    Adopted 399 for, 198 against, 71 abstained

    14:22

← Back to the decision