Amendment 1, after paragraph 89
Implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy and future perspectives
A9-0357/2023 – Gabriel Mato – After § 89 – Am 1
Adopted
- For
- 374
- Against
- 94
- Abstained
- 84
roll-call vote at 12:23 · 68% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 2 | 8 | 0 | 10 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 | Against |
| S&D | 48 | 4 | 1 | 53 | For |
| Renew | 2 | 0 | 32 | 34 | Abstained |
| EPP | 69 | 1 | 0 | 70 | For |
| ECR | 20 | 0 | 1 | 21 | For |
| Patriots | 22 | 0 | 0 | 22 | For |
| ESN | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | For |
| No group | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
4 MEPs of 552 Clear filters
Christine Anderson Germany · ESN
For
Ivan David Czechia · ESN
For
Markus Buchheit Germany · ESN
For
Milan Uhrík Slovakia · ESN
Abstained voted against their group’s line
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.