Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

Implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy and future perspectives

24 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 amendments (2 adopted, 1 rejected) and 20 parts of the text voted on separately (16 adopted, 4 rejected).

· 20

20 votes on parts of the text: 16 adopted, 4 rejected

  1. Vote 1:Paragraph 6 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by Greens

    ‘Therefore, believes that the CFP must continue to be implemented,’

  2. Vote 2:Paragraph 6 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted 440 for, 78 against, 31 abstained

    Split vote by Greens

    ‘and where needed, reformed and adapted accordingly;’

  3. Vote 3:Separate vote on paragraph 15

    A9-0357/2023 – Gabriel Mato – § 15

    Adopted 393 for, 87 against, 43 abstained

    12:21

    Roll call requested by Greens

  4. Vote 4:Separate vote on paragraph 16

    Rejected show of hands

  5. Vote 5:Separate vote on paragraph 23

    Rejected show of hands

  6. Vote 6:Separate vote on paragraph 26, indent 4

    Adopted show of hands

  7. Vote 8:Separate vote on paragraph 36

    Rejected show of hands

  8. Vote 9:Paragraph 41 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted 317 for, 219 against, 17 abstained

    Split vote by ID

    The part voted on

    ‘Also calls on the Commission to review the EMFAF, in line with the WTO Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies, adopted at its 12th Ministerial Conference (MC12) on 17 June 2022, with a view to reaching carbon neutrality;’

  9. Vote 10:Paragraph 41 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ID

    ‘calls for financing for new vessels to be approved, within the parameters laid down in international fisheries agreements;’

  10. Vote 11:Separate vote on paragraph 42

    Rejected show of hands

  11. Vote 12:Separate vote on paragraph 53

    A9-0357/2023 – Gabriel Mato – § 53

    Adopted 380 for, 133 against, 42 abstained

    12:22

    Roll call requested by Greens

  12. Vote 13:Separate vote on paragraph 63

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by Greens

  13. Vote 14:Paragraph 70 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ID

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘“(including implementing acts that set restrictions on fisheries)’

  14. Vote 15:Paragraph 70 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ID

    those words

  15. Vote 17:Separate vote on paragraph 83

    A9-0357/2023 – Gabriel Mato – § 83

    Adopted 423 for, 108 against, 7 abstained

    12:23

    Roll call requested by ID · separate vote by Greens

  16. Vote 18:Separate vote on paragraph 88

    A9-0357/2023 – Gabriel Mato – § 88

    Adopted 438 for, 97 against, 10 abstained

    12:23

    Roll call requested by Greens

  17. Vote 20:Paragraph 91 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ID

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘based largely on historical rights’

  18. Vote 21:Paragraph 91 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ID

    those words

  19. Vote 22:Separate vote on paragraph 109

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ID

  20. Vote 23:Paragraph 109 — part 2

    A9-0357/2023 – Gabriel Mato – § 109/2

    Adopted 444 for, 109 against, 6 abstained

    12:24

    Roll call requested by ID · split vote by ID

    those words

· 3

  1. Vote 7:Amendment 5 to paragraph 31

    A9-0357/2023 – Gabriel Mato – § 31 – Am 5

    Rejected 153 for, 355 against, 44 abstained

    12:22

    Roll call requested by Greens

  2. Vote 16:Amendment 2 to paragraph 82

    A9-0357/2023 – Gabriel Mato – § 82 – Am 2

    Adopted 308 for, 239 against, 11 abstained

    12:23

    Roll call requested by Greens

  3. Vote 19:Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 89

    A9-0357/2023 – Gabriel Mato – After § 89 – Am 1

    Adopted 374 for, 94 against, 84 abstained

    12:23

    Roll call requested by ECR

· 1

  1. Vote 24:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote

    A9-0357/2023 – Gabriel Mato – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

    Adopted 371 for, 92 against, 92 abstained

    12:24

← Back to the decision