Separate vote: paragraph 88
Implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy and future perspectives
A9-0357/2023 – Gabriel Mato – § 88
Adopted
- For
- 438
- Against
- 97
- Abstained
- 10
roll-call vote at 12:23 · 80% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 2 | 7 | 0 | 9 | Against |
| Greens | 1 | 23 | 1 | 25 | Against |
| S&D | 39 | 13 | 1 | 53 | For |
| Renew | 34 | 1 | 0 | 35 | For |
| EPP | 71 | 0 | 0 | 71 | For |
| ECR | 21 | 0 | 0 | 21 | For |
| Patriots | 22 | 0 | 0 | 22 | For |
| ESN | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | For |
| No group | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
545 MEPs voted. Open a group, or filter above.
The Left 9 MEPs
Greens 25 MEPs
S&D 53 MEPs
Renew 35 MEPs
EPP 71 MEPs
ECR 21 MEPs
Patriots 22 MEPs
ESN 4 MEPs
No group 4 MEPs
Former MEPs 301 MEPs
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.