Amendment 50, after paragraph 8
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – After § 8 – Am 50
Rejected
- For
- 215
- Against
- 335
- Abstained
- 54
roll-call vote at 13:44 · 36% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 33 | 2 | 1 | 36 | For |
| Greens | 4 | 0 | 43 | 47 | Abstained |
| S&D | 114 | 0 | 0 | 114 | For |
| Renew | 56 | 9 | 0 | 65 | For |
| EPP | 1 | 150 | 1 | 152 | Against |
| ECR | 0 | 74 | 0 | 74 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 68 | 0 | 68 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 25 | 1 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 7 | 7 | 8 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
36 MEPs of 604 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.