Amendment 18, after paragraph 1
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – After § 1 – Am 18
Rejected
- For
- 111
- Against
- 439
- Abstained
- 51
roll-call vote at 13:35 · 18% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 35 | 0 | 0 | 35 | For |
| Greens | 49 | 0 | 0 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 2 | 108 | 1 | 111 | Against |
| Renew | 18 | 43 | 0 | 61 | Against |
| EPP | 3 | 151 | 1 | 155 | Against |
| ECR | 1 | 31 | 42 | 74 | Divided |
| Patriots | 0 | 69 | 0 | 69 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 3 | 12 | 7 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
69 MEPs of 601 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.