Paragraph 1 — part 2
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – § 1/2
Adopted
- For
- 435
- Against
- 127
- Abstained
- 47
roll-call vote at 13:35 · 71% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘who have long embodied a living example of coexistence between people of different cultures, origins and religions; stresses that this coexistence is not merely a social reality but a daily affirmation of the rule of law, equal rights and the common values that lie at the heart of the European project;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 35 | 1 | 0 | 36 | For |
| Greens | 49 | 0 | 0 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 114 | 0 | 0 | 114 | For |
| Renew | 66 | 0 | 0 | 66 | For |
| EPP | 155 | 0 | 0 | 155 | For |
| ECR | 7 | 27 | 40 | 74 | Divided |
| Patriots | 1 | 63 | 4 | 68 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 8 | 11 | 3 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
609 MEPs voted. Open a group, or filter above.
The Left 36 MEPs
Greens 49 MEPs
S&D 114 MEPs
Renew 66 MEPs
EPP 155 MEPs
ECR 74 MEPs
Patriots 68 MEPs
ESN 25 MEPs
No group 22 MEPs
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.