Paragraph 1 — part 2
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – § 1/2
Adopted
- For
- 435
- Against
- 127
- Abstained
- 47
roll-call vote at 13:35 · 71% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘who have long embodied a living example of coexistence between people of different cultures, origins and religions; stresses that this coexistence is not merely a social reality but a daily affirmation of the rule of law, equal rights and the common values that lie at the heart of the European project;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 35 | 1 | 0 | 36 | For |
| Greens | 49 | 0 | 0 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 114 | 0 | 0 | 114 | For |
| Renew | 66 | 0 | 0 | 66 | For |
| EPP | 155 | 0 | 0 | 155 | For |
| ECR | 7 | 27 | 40 | 74 | Divided |
| Patriots | 1 | 63 | 4 | 68 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 8 | 11 | 3 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
36 MEPs of 609 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.