Paragraph 13 — part 1
Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up
B10-0386/2026 – § 13/1
Adopted
- For
- 490
- Against
- 120
- Abstained
- 3
roll-call vote at 13:29 · 80% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens, EPP · split vote by EPP, The Left
The part voted on: ‘Calls on the Commission to review and simplify the implementation of the Fisheries Control Regulation, including reporting obligations, digital traceability requirements, catch registration procedures, weighing rules and electronic monitoring systems, ensuring that control measures remain proportionate, operationally feasible and adapted to the realities of fishing activities;’ without the words ‘the implementation of’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 1 | 36 | 0 | 37 | Against |
| Greens | 4 | 45 | 0 | 49 | Against |
| S&D | 87 | 28 | 0 | 115 | For |
| Renew | 63 | 3 | 0 | 66 | For |
| EPP | 155 | 1 | 0 | 156 | For |
| ECR | 70 | 3 | 0 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 69 | 0 | 0 | 69 | For |
| ESN | 23 | 0 | 2 | 25 | For |
| No group | 18 | 4 | 1 | 23 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 613 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.