Paragraph 5 — part 3
Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up
B10-0386/2026 – § 5/3
Adopted
- For
- 489
- Against
- 116
- Abstained
- 9
roll-call vote at 13:28 · 80% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by Greens
The part voted on: ‘and to revise the fishing-capacity framework’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 1 | 36 | 0 | 37 | Against |
| Greens | 4 | 45 | 0 | 49 | Against |
| S&D | 89 | 26 | 0 | 115 | For |
| Renew | 64 | 2 | 1 | 67 | For |
| EPP | 156 | 0 | 0 | 156 | For |
| ECR | 69 | 4 | 0 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 69 | 0 | 0 | 69 | For |
| ESN | 22 | 0 | 3 | 25 | For |
| No group | 15 | 3 | 5 | 23 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
69 MEPs of 614 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.