Paragraph 63 — part 1
Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 63/1
Adopted
- For
- 460
- Against
- 129
- Abstained
- 64
roll-call vote at 14:42 · 70% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Renew · split vote by Members (A), Members (B)
The part voted on: ‘Emphasises the critical role of civil society organisations in providing needs-based, community-level and peer-to-peer healthcare services, particularly for women facing poverty, discrimination or social exclusion; stresses that these organisations act as a bridge between patients and public institutions, and also work to advance gender equality and SRHR, collect data on women’s health experiences and needs, prevent online health scams, and contribute to ensuring more gender-inclusive laws and policies in the field of healthcare;’ without the words ‘and SRHR’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 40 | 0 | 0 | 40 | For |
| Greens | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | For |
| S&D | 128 | 0 | 0 | 128 | For |
| Renew | 69 | 0 | 0 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 154 | 6 | 2 | 162 | For |
| ECR | 5 | 67 | 4 | 76 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 22 | 55 | 77 | Abstained |
| ESN | 0 | 24 | 0 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 14 | 10 | 3 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
69 MEPs of 653 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.