Paragraph 62 — part 3
Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 62/3
Adopted
- For
- 325
- Against
- 296
- Abstained
- 33
roll-call vote at 14:42 · 50% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Renew · split vote by Members (A)
The part voted on: ‘ring-fenced’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 40 | 0 | 0 | 40 | For |
| Greens | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | For |
| S&D | 129 | 0 | 0 | 129 | For |
| Renew | 61 | 2 | 8 | 71 | For |
| EPP | 7 | 152 | 3 | 162 | Against |
| ECR | 0 | 76 | 0 | 76 | Against |
| Patriots | 27 | 39 | 11 | 77 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 23 | 0 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 11 | 4 | 11 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
23 MEPs of 654 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.