Paragraph 62 — part 1
Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 62/1
Adopted
- For
- 450
- Against
- 168
- Abstained
- 37
roll-call vote at 14:41 · 69% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Renew · split vote by Members (A)
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls on the Commission to prioritise earmarked funding under the new European Competitiveness Fund and Horizon Europe 2028-2034 (FP10) for research into women’s health;’ and ‘ring-fenced’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 40 | 0 | 0 | 40 | For |
| Greens | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | For |
| S&D | 128 | 0 | 0 | 128 | For |
| Renew | 63 | 0 | 7 | 70 | For |
| EPP | 153 | 7 | 2 | 162 | For |
| ECR | 6 | 65 | 6 | 77 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 62 | 15 | 77 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 24 | 0 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 10 | 10 | 7 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
128 MEPs of 655 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.