Recital J — part 2
Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – Recital J/2
Adopted
- For
- 465
- Against
- 134
- Abstained
- 64
roll-call vote at 13:53 · 70% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN
The part voted on: ‘whereas this logic should apply to large information society service providers who benefit from the information ecosystem while simultaneously creating systemic risks to democratic integrity;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 40 | 0 | 0 | 40 | For |
| Greens | 49 | 2 | 0 | 51 | For |
| S&D | 122 | 0 | 0 | 122 | For |
| Renew | 71 | 0 | 2 | 73 | For |
| EPP | 172 | 1 | 0 | 173 | For |
| ECR | 1 | 45 | 31 | 77 | Divided |
| Patriots | 0 | 50 | 24 | 74 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 10 | 10 | 7 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
26 MEPs of 663 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.