Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

139 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 61 amendments (2 adopted, 59 rejected) and 77 parts of the text voted on separately (42 adopted, 35 rejected).

· 61

61 amendment votes: 2 adopted, 59 rejected
  1. Vote 1:Amendment 27 to paragraph 1

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 1 – Am 27

    Rejected 135 for, 480 against, 56 abstained

    13:35

    Roll call requested by ESN

  2. Vote 2:Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 1 – Am 2

    Rejected 210 for, 439 against, 14 abstained

    13:35
  3. Vote 3:Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 1

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 1 – Am 28

    Rejected 198 for, 467 against, 5 abstained

    13:36
  4. Vote 4:Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 2

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 2 – Am 29

    Rejected 192 for, 465 against, 8 abstained

    13:36
  5. Vote 5:Amendment 88, adding text after paragraph 2

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 2 – Am 88

    Rejected 169 for, 471 against, 27 abstained

    13:36

    Roll call requested by ECR

  6. Vote 7:Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 3

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 3 – Am 30

    Rejected 197 for, 465 against, 5 abstained

    13:36
  7. Vote 9:Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 4

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 4 – Am 58

    Rejected 93 for, 458 against, 103 abstained

    13:36

    Roll call requested by ECR

  8. Vote 11:Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 4

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 4 – Am 60

    Rejected 122 for, 465 against, 71 abstained

    13:37

    Roll call requested by ECR

  9. Vote 13:Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 5

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 5 – Am 57

    Adopted 568 for, 38 against, 64 abstained

    13:37

    Roll call requested by Renew

  10. Vote 14:Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 6

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 6 – Am 15

    Rejected 155 for, 435 against, 80 abstained

    13:37

    Roll call requested by The Left

  11. Vote 19:Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 12

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 12 – Am 31

    Rejected 197 for, 462 against, 10 abstained

    13:38
  12. Vote 23:Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 13

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 13 – Am 65

    Rejected 154 for, 474 against, 41 abstained

    13:38

    Roll call requested by ECR

  13. Vote 27:Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 19

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 19 – Am 32

    Rejected 188 for, 464 against, 10 abstained

    13:39
  14. Vote 28:Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 20

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 20 – Am 33

    Rejected 191 for, 462 against, 6 abstained

    13:39
  15. Vote 30:Amendment 34 to paragraph 22

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 22 – Am 34

    Rejected 133 for, 481 against, 55 abstained

    13:40
  16. Vote 32:Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 24

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 24 – Am 16

    Rejected 111 for, 535 against, 18 abstained

    13:40

    Roll call requested by The Left

  17. Vote 33:Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 25

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 25 – Am 35

    Rejected 188 for, 452 against, 16 abstained

    13:40
  18. Vote 37:Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 29

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 29 – Am 36

    Rejected 140 for, 493 against, 24 abstained

    13:41
  19. Vote 38:Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 29

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 29 – Am 37

    Rejected 162 for, 450 against, 36 abstained

    13:41
  20. Vote 42:Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 32

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 32 – Am 17

    Rejected 168 for, 447 against, 46 abstained

    13:42

    Roll call requested by The Left

  21. Vote 45:Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 34

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 34 – Am 3

    Rejected 201 for, 446 against, 17 abstained

    13:42
  22. Vote 47:Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 34

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 34 – Am 38

    Rejected 192 for, 462 against, 11 abstained

    13:42
  23. Vote 49:Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 42

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 42 – Am 19

    Rejected 85 for, 538 against, 44 abstained

    13:43

    Roll call requested by The Left

  24. Vote 50:Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 44

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 44 – Am 20

    Rejected 128 for, 492 against, 46 abstained

    13:43

    Roll call requested by The Left

  25. Vote 52:Amendment 92 to paragraph 48

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 48 – Am 92

    Rejected 217 for, 427 against, 19 abstained

    13:43

    Roll call requested by ECR

  26. Vote 54:Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 48

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 48 – Am 4

    Rejected 173 for, 457 against, 32 abstained

    13:44
  27. Vote 55:Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 48

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 48 – Am 39

    Rejected 195 for, 455 against, 4 abstained

    13:44
  28. Vote 56:Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 48

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 48 – Am 40

    Rejected 129 for, 465 against, 73 abstained

    13:44
  29. Vote 57:Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 48

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 48 – Am 41

    Rejected 170 for, 462 against, 35 abstained

    13:44
  30. Vote 61:Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 53

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 53 – Am 5

    Rejected 212 for, 439 against, 10 abstained

    13:45
  31. Vote 62:Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 53

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 53 – Am 42

    Rejected 197 for, 464 against, 4 abstained

    13:45
  32. Vote 63:Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 56

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 56 – Am 43

    Rejected 201 for, 453 against, 5 abstained

    13:45
  33. Vote 64:Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 56

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 56 – Am 44

    Rejected 148 for, 462 against, 59 abstained

    13:45
  34. Vote 65:Amendment 45 to paragraph 61

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 61 – Am 45

    Rejected 178 for, 463 against, 12 abstained

    13:45
  35. Vote 67:Amendment 82 to paragraph 65

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 65 – Am 82

    Rejected 194 for, 437 against, 28 abstained

    13:46

    Roll call requested by ECR

  36. Vote 70:Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 78

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 78 – Am 46

    Rejected 209 for, 450 against, 11 abstained

    13:46
  37. Vote 71:Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 78

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 78 – Am 47

    Rejected 191 for, 458 against, 7 abstained

    13:46
  38. Vote 72:Amendment 48, adding text after paragraph 78

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 78 – Am 48

    Rejected 190 for, 460 against, 5 abstained

    13:46
  39. Vote 73:Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 79

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 79 – Am 49

    Rejected 203 for, 446 against, 7 abstained

    13:46
  40. Vote 74:Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 79

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 79 – Am 50

    Rejected 196 for, 461 against, 6 abstained

    13:47
  41. Vote 75:Amendment 51 to paragraph 80 — part 1

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 80 – Am 51/1

    Rejected 199 for, 458 against, 9 abstained

    13:47

    Split vote by ESN

    The part voted on

    ‘Strongly condemns the instrumentalisation of migration by third countries or hostile non-state actors with the aim of destabilising a Member State or the EU; takes the position that this phenomenon constitutes an unacceptable attempt to exert political pressure on front-line Member States and on the EU; urges the Commission to propose further legislation enabling Member States, in cases of instrumentalisation, to refuse access to asylum procedures at the external border, in accordance with EU and international law; notes the specific provisions on the instrumentalisation of migration recently included in key pieces of EU legislation; further welcomes the recent revision of the EU legal framework to include hybrid threats among the grounds triggering the EU visa suspension mechanism; underlines that a credible and effective EU response must also be based on close coordination and sincere cooperation between neighbouring Member States, and between them and EU institutions, in a spirit of loyalty and mutual solidarity, and on enhanced technological and operational capabilities in border management, while preserving the integrity of the Schengen area and ensuring full respect for the fundamental values of the EU;’

  42. Vote 76:Amendment 51 to paragraph 80 — part 2

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 80 – Am 51/2

    Rejected 209 for, 447 against, 2 abstained

    13:47

    Split vote by ESN

    those words

  43. Vote 79:Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 80

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 80 – Am 6

    Rejected 209 for, 445 against, 11 abstained

    13:47
  44. Vote 80:Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 80

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 80 – Am 52

    Rejected 234 for, 414 against, 12 abstained

    13:47
  45. Vote 87:Amendment 94, adding text after paragraph 88

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 88 – Am 94

    Rejected 117 for, 489 against, 65 abstained

    13:48

    Roll call requested by ECR

  46. Vote 89:Amendment 53 to paragraph 99

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 99 – Am 53

    Rejected 167 for, 470 against, 29 abstained

    13:48
  47. Vote 96:Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 101

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 101 – Am 7

    Rejected 201 for, 447 against, 15 abstained

    13:50
  48. Vote 99:Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 104

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 104 – Am 8

    Rejected 193 for, 454 against, 9 abstained

    13:50
  49. Vote 100:Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 104

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 104 – Am 9

    Rejected 217 for, 435 against, 6 abstained

    13:50

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  50. Vote 101:Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 107

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 107 – Am 54

    Rejected 193 for, 459 against, 6 abstained

    13:50
  51. Vote 103:Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 110 — part 1

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 110 – Am 25/1

    Rejected 287 for, 366 against, 11 abstained

    13:50

    Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by The Left

    The part voted on

    ‘Reiterates that Members of the European Parliament must act in accordance with the Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament regarding integrity and transparency;’

  52. Vote 104:Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 110 — part 2

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 110 – Am 25/2

    Rejected 118 for, 448 against, 89 abstained

    13:51

    Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by The Left

    The part voted on

    ‘recommends in this regard that an audit be performed on the general allowance of and all other forms of financial contributions to Members of the European Parliament on a yearly basis in order to increase Parliament’s transparency and trust in its Members among the citizens of the EU as well as reduce the risk of undue influence, interference or corruption;’

  53. Vote 105:Amendment 86 to paragraph 115

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 115 – Am 86

    Rejected 247 for, 398 against, 17 abstained

    13:51

    Roll call requested by ECR

  54. Vote 109:Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 115

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 115 – Am 55

    Rejected 203 for, 436 against, 10 abstained

    13:51

    Roll call requested by ESN

  55. Vote 112:Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 132

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 132 – Am 72

    Rejected 177 for, 456 against, 22 abstained

    13:52

    Roll call requested by ECR

  56. Vote 113:Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 132

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 132 – Am 73

    Rejected 204 for, 437 against, 14 abstained

    13:52

    Roll call requested by ECR

  57. Vote 114:Amendment 11, adding text after citation 70

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After citation 70 – Am 11

    Rejected 218 for, 406 against, 39 abstained

    13:52

    Roll call requested by The Left

  58. Vote 126:Amendment 1, adding text after Recital AB

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After Recital AB – Am 1

    Rejected 204 for, 459 against, 3 abstained

    13:53

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  59. Vote 134:Amendment 56, adding text after Recital BT

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After Recital BT – Am 56

    Adopted 502 for, 90 against, 58 abstained

    13:54

    Roll call requested by Renew

  60. Vote 135:Amendment 78 to recital BZ

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – Recital BZ – Am 78

    Rejected 83 for, 513 against, 55 abstained

    13:54

    Roll call requested by ECR

  61. Vote 137:Amendment 80 to recital CL

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – Recital CL – Am 80

    Rejected 153 for, 450 against, 60 abstained

    13:55

    Roll call requested by ECR

· 77

77 votes on parts of the text: 42 adopted, 35 rejected
  1. Vote 6:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2

    Rejected show of hands

  2. Vote 8:Separate vote on paragraph 4

    Rejected show of hands

  3. Vote 10:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 4

    Rejected show of hands

  4. Vote 12:Separate vote on paragraph 5

    Rejected show of hands

  5. Vote 15:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 6

    Rejected show of hands

  6. Vote 16:Paragraph 9 — part 1

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 9/1

    Adopted 425 for, 199 against, 45 abstained

    13:37

    Roll call requested by ESN, Patriots · split vote by ESN

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘considers that the establishment of the Centre as a permanent structure by a legal act would represent a qualitative shift from fragmented coordination towards a more integrated, operational and strategic EU-level capacity;’

  7. Vote 17:Paragraph 9 — part 2

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 9/2

    Adopted 413 for, 237 against, 17 abstained

    13:38

    Roll call requested by ESN, Patriots · split vote by ESN

    those words

  8. Vote 18:Separate vote on paragraph 12

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 12

    Adopted 404 for, 217 against, 30 abstained

    13:38

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  9. Vote 20:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 13

    Rejected show of hands

  10. Vote 21:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 13

    Rejected show of hands

  11. Vote 22:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 13

    Rejected show of hands

  12. Vote 24:Separate vote on paragraph 15

    Adopted 461 for, 198 against, 10 abstained

    Split vote by ESN

  13. Vote 25:Paragraph 15 — part 2

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 15/2

    Adopted 434 for, 195 against, 41 abstained

    13:39

    Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN

    those words

  14. Vote 26:Separate vote on paragraph 17

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 17

    Adopted 434 for, 235 against, 3 abstained

    13:39

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  15. Vote 29:Separate vote on paragraph 21

    Rejected show of hands

  16. Vote 31:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 23

    Rejected show of hands

  17. Vote 34:Paragraph 27 — part 1 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘without abolishing anonymity’ and ‘stresses that measures targeting inauthentic accounts must not undermine the ability to remain anonymous online, which is essential for protecting journalists, activists, marginalised communities and individuals in vulnerable situations (such as whistle-blowers, dissidents and political opponents of autocratic regimes), and should continue to allow space for satirical and humorous accounts;’

  18. Vote 35:Paragraph 27 — part 2 of 3

    Adopted 596 for, 53 against, 13 abstained

    Split vote by EPP

    ‘without abolishing anonymity’

  19. Vote 36:Paragraph 27 — part 3 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    ‘stresses that measures targeting inauthentic accounts must not undermine the ability to remain anonymous online, which is essential for protecting journalists, activists, marginalised communities and individuals in vulnerable situations (such as whistle-blowers, dissidents and political opponents of autocratic regimes), and should continue to allow space for satirical and humorous accounts;’

  20. Vote 39:Separate vote on paragraph 30

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 30

    Adopted 433 for, 137 against, 93 abstained

    13:41

    Roll call requested by ESN

  21. Vote 40:Separate vote on paragraph 32

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

  22. Vote 41:Paragraph 32 — part 2

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 32/2

    Adopted 482 for, 67 against, 121 abstained

    13:42

    Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN

    those words

  23. Vote 43:Separate vote on paragraph 34

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

  24. Vote 44:Paragraph 34 — part 2

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 34/2

    Adopted 440 for, 189 against, 34 abstained

    13:42

    Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN

    those words

  25. Vote 46:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 34

    Rejected show of hands

  26. Vote 48:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 34

    Rejected show of hands

  27. Vote 51:Separate vote on paragraph 47

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 47

    Adopted 458 for, 156 against, 47 abstained

    13:43

    Roll call requested by ESN, Patriots

  28. Vote 53:Separate vote on paragraph 48

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 48

    Adopted 467 for, 185 against, 11 abstained

    13:44

    Roll call requested by Patriots

  29. Vote 58:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 49

    Rejected show of hands

  30. Vote 59:Separate vote on paragraph 50

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

  31. Vote 60:Paragraph 50 — part 2

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 50/2

    Adopted 465 for, 136 against, 62 abstained

    13:45

    Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN

    those words

  32. Vote 66:Separate vote on paragraph 63

    Rejected show of hands

  33. Vote 68:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 77

    Rejected show of hands

  34. Vote 69:Separate vote on paragraph 78

    Adopted show of hands

  35. Vote 77:Separate vote on paragraph 80

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

  36. Vote 78:Paragraph 80 — part 2

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 80/2

    Adopted 466 for, 187 against, 7 abstained

    13:47

    Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN

    those words

  37. Vote 81:Separate vote on paragraph 81

    Rejected show of hands

  38. Vote 82:Separate vote on paragraph 82

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 82

    Adopted 458 for, 163 against, 43 abstained

    13:48

    Roll call requested by ESN

  39. Vote 83:Separate vote on paragraph 86

    Rejected show of hands

  40. Vote 84:Separate vote on paragraph 87

    Rejected show of hands

  41. Vote 85:Separate vote on paragraph 88

    Rejected show of hands

  42. Vote 86:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 88

    Rejected show of hands

  43. Vote 88:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 90

    Rejected show of hands

  44. Vote 90:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 99

    Rejected show of hands

  45. Vote 91:Paragraph 101 — part 1

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 101/1

    Adopted 475 for, 171 against, 22 abstained

    13:49

    Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘local’, ‘regional’, ‘national’ and ‘and in candidate countries’

  46. Vote 92:Paragraph 101 — part 2

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 101/2

    Adopted 460 for, 194 against, 8 abstained

    13:49

    Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN

    ‘local’

  47. Vote 93:Paragraph 101 — part 3

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 101/3

    Adopted 463 for, 194 against, 6 abstained

    13:49

    Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN

    ‘regional’

  48. Vote 94:Paragraph 101 — part 4

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 101/4

    Adopted 459 for, 195 against, 7 abstained

    13:49

    Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN

    ‘national’

  49. Vote 95:Paragraph 101 — part 5

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 101/5

    Adopted 431 for, 181 against, 52 abstained

    13:49

    Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN

    ‘and in candidate countries’

  50. Vote 97:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 101

    Rejected show of hands

  51. Vote 98:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 101

    Rejected show of hands

  52. Vote 102:Separate vote on paragraph 108

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 108

    Adopted 503 for, 108 against, 57 abstained

    13:50

    Roll call requested by ESN

  53. Vote 106:Paragraph 115 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    ‘Considers sanctions against individuals and state and non-state entities engaged in actions aimed at undermining the democratic integrity of the EU or its Member States to be an essential component of the European Democracy Shield’s toolbox; further stresses that effective sanctions must be adopted based on objective and consistent criteria and must include a comprehensive set of measures, including asset freezing and confiscation, clear attribution and public exposure, cost increases and revenue cuts, bans on imports and exports, travel bans, the denial of access to EU markets and financial systems, and other effective, robust and impactful restrictive measures;’

  54. Vote 107:Paragraph 115 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    ‘reiterates its call on the Council to gradually transition to qualified majority voting for decisions in areas of the common foreign and security policy such as sanctions;’

  55. Vote 108:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 115

    Rejected show of hands

  56. Vote 110:Separate vote on paragraph 116

    Rejected show of hands

  57. Vote 111:Separate vote on paragraph 118

    Rejected show of hands

  58. Vote 115:Separate vote on recital B

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – Recital B

    Adopted 555 for, 94 against, 21 abstained

    13:52

    Roll call requested by ESN

  59. Vote 116:Separate vote on recital C

    Rejected show of hands

  60. Vote 117:Vote on text inserted after recital C

    Rejected show of hands

  61. Vote 118:Separate vote on recital D

    Rejected show of hands

  62. Vote 119:Separate vote on recital G

    Rejected show of hands

  63. Vote 120:Separate vote on recital J

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

  64. Vote 121:Recital J — part 2

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – Recital J/2

    Adopted 465 for, 134 against, 64 abstained

    13:53

    Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN

    The part voted on

    ‘whereas this logic should apply to large information society service providers who benefit from the information ecosystem while simultaneously creating systemic risks to democratic integrity;’

  65. Vote 122:Recital O — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘as evidenced by the amplification of extremist political content during elections across the EU’

  66. Vote 123:Recital O — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

    those words

  67. Vote 124:Recital R — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘thereby exposing themselves to risks linked to addictive design, harmful content and manipulative practices’

  68. Vote 125:Recital R — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

    those words

  69. Vote 127:Separate vote on recital AU

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – Recital AU

    Adopted 461 for, 193 against, 8 abstained

    13:53

    Roll call requested by ESN

  70. Vote 128:Separate vote on recital BC

    Rejected show of hands

  71. Vote 129:Recital BK — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    ‘whereas fossil-free energy is a crucial stepping stone for Europe’s energy sovereignty;’

  72. Vote 130:Recital BK — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    ‘whereas according to analysis published in 2025 by Wood Mackenzie, 9 of the 10 largest global solar inverter suppliers were based in China; whereas hidden communication devices have been discovered in Chinese-made solar power inverters used in Europe and the United States; whereas according to the Czech cybersecurity office, there are risks regarding data protection and, in extreme cases, remote manipulation of solar inverters; whereas solar power plants interconnected through a decentralised dense network are susceptible to cyberattacks and therefore require adequate cybersecurity safeguards;’

  73. Vote 131:Recital BT — part 1 of 2

    Rejected show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

    The part voted on

    ‘whereas Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and China’s assertive geopolitical posture have intensified the use of disinformation, economic coercion and strategic influence, targeting not only the EU, but also vulnerable regions such as the Western Balkans, Eastern Partnership countries and the Global South; whereas various sources reveal that Russia’s annual budget for spreading disinformation and propaganda amounts to several billion euro; whereas Russia’s disinformation warfare has not been matched by the EU with adequate financing or effective strategy; whereas elections and political events across Europe demonstrate persistent, targeted and sophisticated full-scale offensive hybrid warfare perpetrated by Russia, aiming to destabilise trust in European political systems and institutions, and to create constant confusion between facts and false information;’

  74. Vote 132:Recital BT — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by ESN

    ‘whereas such warfare requires an appropriate response and a shift from a mere defensive strategy to an offensive one;’

  75. Vote 133:Recital BT — part 2

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – Recital BT/2

    Adopted 459 for, 189 against, 14 abstained

    13:54

    Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN

    ‘whereas such warfare requires an appropriate response and a shift from a mere defensive strategy to an offensive one;’

  76. Vote 136:Vote on text inserted after recital BZ

    Rejected show of hands

  77. Vote 138:Vote on text inserted after recital CN

    Rejected show of hands

· 1

  1. Vote 139:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote

    A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

    Adopted 420 for, 220 against, 26 abstained

    13:55

← Back to the decision