Paragraph 101 — part 5
Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 101/5
Adopted
- For
- 431
- Against
- 181
- Abstained
- 52
roll-call vote at 13:49 · 65% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN
The part voted on: ‘and in candidate countries’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 6 | 3 | 30 | 39 | Abstained |
| Greens | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | For |
| S&D | 123 | 0 | 0 | 123 | For |
| Renew | 75 | 0 | 0 | 75 | For |
| EPP | 169 | 2 | 1 | 172 | For |
| ECR | 4 | 69 | 5 | 78 | Against |
| Patriots | 2 | 58 | 14 | 74 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 27 | 0 | 27 | Against |
| No group | 2 | 22 | 2 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
39 MEPs of 664 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.