Amendment 51 — part 1 to paragraph 80
Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 80 – Am 51/1
Rejected
- For
- 199
- Against
- 458
- Abstained
- 9
roll-call vote at 13:47 · 30% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by ESN
The part voted on: ‘Strongly condemns the instrumentalisation of migration by third countries or hostile non-state actors with the aim of destabilising a Member State or the EU; takes the position that this phenomenon constitutes an unacceptable attempt to exert political pressure on front-line Member States and on the EU; urges the Commission to propose further legislation enabling Member States, in cases of instrumentalisation, to refuse access to asylum procedures at the external border, in accordance with EU and international law; notes the specific provisions on the instrumentalisation of migration recently included in key pieces of EU legislation; further welcomes the recent revision of the EU legal framework to include hybrid threats among the grounds triggering the EU visa suspension mechanism; underlines that a credible and effective EU response must also be based on close coordination and sincere cooperation between neighbouring Member States, and between them and EU institutions, in a spirit of loyalty and mutual solidarity, and on enhanced technological and operational capabilities in border management, while preserving the integrity of the Schengen area and ensuring full respect for the fundamental values of the EU;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 40 | 0 | 40 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 51 | 0 | 51 | Against |
| S&D | 0 | 123 | 0 | 123 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 73 | 0 | 73 | Against |
| EPP | 10 | 163 | 2 | 175 | Against |
| ECR | 76 | 0 | 1 | 77 | For |
| Patriots | 73 | 0 | 0 | 73 | For |
| ESN | 27 | 0 | 0 | 27 | For |
| No group | 13 | 8 | 6 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
27 MEPs of 666 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.