Paragraph 9 — part 1
Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield
A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 9/1
Adopted
- For
- 425
- Against
- 199
- Abstained
- 45
roll-call vote at 13:37 · 64% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ESN, Patriots · split vote by ESN
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘considers that the establishment of the Centre as a permanent structure by a legal act would represent a qualitative shift from fragmented coordination towards a more integrated, operational and strategic EU-level capacity;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 4 | 2 | 32 | 38 | Abstained |
| Greens | 51 | 0 | 0 | 51 | For |
| S&D | 127 | 0 | 0 | 127 | For |
| Renew | 67 | 1 | 6 | 74 | For |
| EPP | 172 | 2 | 0 | 174 | For |
| ECR | 2 | 71 | 4 | 77 | Against |
| Patriots | 1 | 74 | 0 | 75 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 1 | 23 | 3 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
77 MEPs of 669 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.