Amendment 7 — part 4
Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures
A10-0201/2026 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate and split votes – Am 7/4
Adopted
- For
- 451
- Against
- 197
- Abstained
- 8
roll-call vote at 13:07 · 69% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by S&D, EPP, Patriots
The part voted on: ‘Any temporary derogation should be strictly limited to what is necessary and proportionate to address the structural constraints of such regions, and should not create a risk of circumvention of the CBAM, including through diversion or re-export.’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 28 | 7 | 0 | 35 | For |
| Greens | 51 | 0 | 0 | 51 | For |
| S&D | 122 | 0 | 0 | 122 | For |
| Renew | 71 | 1 | 0 | 72 | For |
| EPP | 149 | 27 | 0 | 176 | For |
| ECR | 20 | 53 | 0 | 73 | Against |
| Patriots | 1 | 73 | 0 | 74 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 9 | 10 | 8 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
26 MEPs of 656 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.