Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

, Climate & environment

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures

Passed by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For
464
Against
50
Abstained
159

roll-call vote at 13:14 · 69% of votes cast in favour

Committee report by Mohammed Chahim · · Report A-10-2026-0201

AI:What this decision does

The Commission proposal would extend the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) from 1 January 2028 to selected steel- and aluminium-intensive downstream products, and add measures against avoidance behaviour such as enhanced reporting, traceability and stronger powers on misdeclaration.§2: source passage in the text Parliament adopted its position on this law at first reading, which sets out the changes MEPs want to the proposal before it can be agreed with the Council.§1: source passage in the text Parliament also calls on the Commission to refer the matter to it again if the proposal is replaced or substantially amended, and instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.§1: source passage in the text

Written by AI from the text voted on · counts are the official record · Read the text · Report a problem

How the groups voted

For: The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP; Abstained: ECR, ESN; Divided: Patriots

  • The Left For 38 for, 1 against, 1 abstainedof 44
  • Greens For 50 for, 0 against, 0 abstainedof 53
  • S&D For 121 for, 0 against, 5 abstainedof 135
  • Renew For 66 for, 0 against, 7 abstainedof 78
  • EPP For 169 for, 1 against, 7 abstainedof 184
  • ECR Abstained 4 for, 7 against, 67 abstainedof 84
  • Patriots Divided 6 for, 28 against, 41 abstainedof 85
  • ESN Abstained 0 for, 7 against, 20 abstainedof 27
  • No group not a group 10 for, 6 against, 11 abstainedof 28

Groups from left to right · for–against–abstained, of the group’s MEPs

A group is shown as divided when no position has two thirds of its votes.

Did not vote with their group

40 MEPs voted differently from their group’s clear line (two thirds of its votes).

Groups as they are now; members who changed group are compared with their current one.

Find an MEP

Opens the list of MEPs on the vote page, filtered to the country you pick.

How each of the 673 MEPs voted →

How it got here

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 17 amendments (5 adopted, 12 rejected) and 36 parts of the text voted on separately (14 adopted, 4 rejected, 18 lapsed). Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.

All 72 votes on this decision →

Go deeper