Recital G — part 2
Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Recital G/2
Adopted
- For
- 438
- Against
- 182
- Abstained
- 50
roll-call vote at 13:53 · 65% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Members (a) · split vote by Members (a)
The part voted on: ‘whereas a majority of migrants coming to Europe arrive through legal channels; whereas SDG 10 target 7 calls for countries to facilitate the orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people through planned and well-managed migration policies’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 44 | 0 | 0 | 44 | For |
| Greens | 48 | 0 | 0 | 48 | For |
| S&D | 132 | 0 | 0 | 132 | For |
| Renew | 67 | 0 | 0 | 67 | For |
| EPP | 135 | 29 | 4 | 168 | For |
| ECR | 1 | 37 | 40 | 78 | Divided |
| Patriots | 0 | 79 | 0 | 79 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 11 | 12 | 6 | 29 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
29 MEPs of 670 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.