Every vote on this decision
Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries
29 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published., where every MEP’s position is recorded.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 9 amendments (1 adopted, 8 rejected) and 19 parts of the text voted on separately (19 adopted).
A proposed change to the text, voted on before the final vote. · 9
-
Vote 1:Amendment 1
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 1
Rejected 150 for, 474 against, 47 abstained
13:51Roll call requested by ESN, S&D
-
Vote 2:Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – After § 1 – Am 9
Rejected 224 for, 404 against, 31 abstained
13:51Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 5:Amendment 10 to paragraph 15
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – § 15 – Am 10
Rejected 234 for, 423 against, 14 abstained
13:51Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 9:Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 18
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – After § 18 – Am 4
Adopted 431 for, 223 against, 10 abstained
13:52Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 10:Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 25
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – After § 25 – Am 11
Rejected 222 for, 429 against, 14 abstained
13:53 -
Vote 11:Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 33
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – After § 33 – Am 12
Rejected 244 for, 410 against, 12 abstained
13:53Roll call requested by S&D, Patriots
-
Vote 21:Amendment 6 to recital Q
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Recital Q – Am 6
Rejected 236 for, 425 against, 7 abstained
13:55 -
Vote 27:Amendment 7, adding text after recital AI
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – After recital AI – Am 7
Rejected 218 for, 419 against, 30 abstained
13:56Roll call requested by Patriots
-
Vote 28:Amendment 8 to recital AJ
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Recital AJ – Am 8
Rejected 221 for, 426 against, 21 abstained
13:56
A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. · 19
19 votes on parts of the text: 19 adopted
-
Vote 3:Separate vote on paragraph 11
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members (a)
-
Vote 4:Paragraph 11 — part 2
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – § 11/2
Adopted 455 for, 211 against, 7 abstained
13:51Roll call requested by Members (a) · split vote by Members (a)
those words
-
Vote 6:Separate vote on paragraph 15
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members (a)
-
Vote 7:Paragraph 15 — part 2
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – § 15/2
Adopted 253 for, 165 against, 214 abstained
13:52Roll call requested by Members (a) · split vote by Members (a)
The part voted on
‘as well as by providing safer alternatives through the creation of legal channels for safe and regular migration and labour mobility; underlines that strict border control without alternative legal pathways for migration shifts migration routes, introducing different steps into the journey and new transit countries, thus increasing the precariousness of the journey and the exposure of migrants to smuggling networks, extortion and violence’
-
Vote 8:Separate vote on paragraph 17
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 12:Recital B — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members (b)
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas applicants for international protection can remain in the Member States responsible, pending a decision on their application;’
-
Vote 13:Recital B — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members (b)
those words
-
Vote 14:Separate vote on recital G
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members (a)
-
Vote 15:Recital G — part 2
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Recital G/2
Adopted 438 for, 182 against, 50 abstained
13:53Roll call requested by Members (a) · split vote by Members (a)
The part voted on
‘whereas a majority of migrants coming to Europe arrive through legal channels; whereas SDG 10 target 7 calls for countries to facilitate the orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people through planned and well-managed migration policies’
-
Vote 16:Recital I — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members (b)
Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas acceptance rates for asylum seekers from these countries vary considerably;’
-
Vote 17:Recital I — part 2 of 2
Adopted 348 for, 304 against, 16 abstained
Split vote by Members (b)
those words
-
Vote 18:Separate vote on recital J
Adopted 408 for, 200 against, 63 abstained
Separate vote by Members
-
Vote 19:Recital K — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members (b)
Text as a whole without the words: ‘124 000 non-EU citizens were refused entry into the EU, 919 000 were found without status,’
-
Vote 20:Recital K — part 2 of 2
Adopted 341 for, 234 against, 91 abstained
Split vote by Members (b)
those words
-
Vote 22:Recital S — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members (b)
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas, while economic and environmental drivers do not alone constitute grounds for asylum, they significantly contribute to vulnerability factors that may require an international comprehensive protection-oriented response;’
-
Vote 23:Recital S — part 2 of 2
Adopted 293 for, 205 against, 168 abstained
Split vote by Members (b)
those words
-
Vote 24:Separate vote on recital U
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Recital U
Adopted 419 for, 226 against, 20 abstained
13:55Roll call requested by Members (a)
-
Vote 25:Separate vote on recital AC
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by Members (a)
-
Vote 26:Recital AC — part 2
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Recital AC/2
Adopted 442 for, 178 against, 46 abstained
13:56Roll call requested by Members (a) · split vote by Members (a)
‘and developing legal migration pathways;’
The last vote on a text as a whole, after all amendments. It decides whether the text is adopted. · 1
-
Vote 29:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted 344 for, 237 against, 66 abstained
13:56