Paragraph 15 — part 2
Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – § 15/2
Adopted
- For
- 253
- Against
- 165
- Abstained
- 214
roll-call vote at 13:52 · 40% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Members (a) · split vote by Members (a)
The part voted on: ‘as well as by providing safer alternatives through the creation of legal channels for safe and regular migration and labour mobility; underlines that strict border control without alternative legal pathways for migration shifts migration routes, introducing different steps into the journey and new transit countries, thus increasing the precariousness of the journey and the exposure of migrants to smuggling networks, extortion and violence’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 44 | 0 | 0 | 44 | For |
| Greens | 48 | 0 | 0 | 48 | For |
| S&D | 88 | 0 | 4 | 92 | For |
| Renew | 59 | 6 | 3 | 68 | For |
| EPP | 5 | 11 | 153 | 169 | Abstained |
| ECR | 1 | 35 | 42 | 78 | Divided |
| Patriots | 0 | 74 | 5 | 79 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 24 | 1 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 8 | 15 | 6 | 29 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
68 MEPs of 632 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.