Amendment 9, after paragraph 1
Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries
A10-0147/2026 – Lukas Mandl – After § 1 – Am 9
Rejected
- For
- 224
- Against
- 404
- Abstained
- 31
roll-call vote at 13:51 · 34% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 40 | 0 | 40 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 47 | 0 | 47 | Against |
| S&D | 7 | 125 | 0 | 132 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 66 | 0 | 66 | Against |
| EPP | 29 | 114 | 26 | 169 | Against |
| ECR | 72 | 0 | 4 | 76 | For |
| Patriots | 75 | 0 | 0 | 75 | For |
| ESN | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | For |
| No group | 16 | 12 | 1 | 29 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
40 MEPs of 659 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.