Amendment 1 to paragraph 4
New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities
RC-B10-0216/2026 – § 4 – Am 1
Rejected
- For
- 104
- Against
- 377
- Abstained
- 86
roll-call vote at 13:09 · 18% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Renew
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 20 | 3 | 3 | 26 | For |
| Greens | 2 | 43 | 0 | 45 | Against |
| S&D | 70 | 16 | 23 | 109 | Divided |
| Renew | 0 | 65 | 0 | 65 | Against |
| EPP | 0 | 139 | 0 | 139 | Against |
| ECR | 3 | 65 | 0 | 68 | Against |
| Patriots | 4 | 11 | 50 | 65 | Abstained |
| ESN | 1 | 22 | 1 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 4 | 13 | 9 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
68 MEPs of 567 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.