Amendment 1 to paragraph 4
New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities
RC-B10-0216/2026 – § 4 – Am 1
Rejected
- For
- 104
- Against
- 377
- Abstained
- 86
roll-call vote at 13:09 · 18% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Renew
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 20 | 3 | 3 | 26 | For |
| Greens | 2 | 43 | 0 | 45 | Against |
| S&D | 70 | 16 | 23 | 109 | Divided |
| Renew | 0 | 65 | 0 | 65 | Against |
| EPP | 0 | 139 | 0 | 139 | Against |
| ECR | 3 | 65 | 0 | 68 | Against |
| Patriots | 4 | 11 | 50 | 65 | Abstained |
| ESN | 1 | 22 | 1 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 4 | 13 | 9 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
567 MEPs voted. Open a group, or filter above.
The Left 26 MEPs
Greens 45 MEPs
S&D 109 MEPs
Renew 65 MEPs
EPP 139 MEPs
ECR 68 MEPs
Patriots 65 MEPs
ESN 24 MEPs
No group 26 MEPs
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.