Paragraph 17 — part 3
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026
A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 17/3
Rejected
- For
- 282
- Against
- 335
- Abstained
- 17
roll-call vote at 13:05 · 44% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by EPP
The part voted on: ‘and stresses the importance of monitoring its use during this cycle of the European Semester; calls for measures to combat speculation and regulate short-term rentals in areas under housing stress;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 43 | 0 | 0 | 43 | For |
| Greens | 47 | 0 | 0 | 47 | For |
| S&D | 121 | 0 | 0 | 121 | For |
| Renew | 51 | 16 | 2 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 1 | 154 | 8 | 163 | Against |
| ECR | 0 | 74 | 3 | 77 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 63 | 0 | 63 | Against |
| ESN | 1 | 22 | 2 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 18 | 6 | 2 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 634 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.