Paragraph 17 — part 2
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026
A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 17/2
Adopted
- For
- 287
- Against
- 278
- Abstained
- 49
roll-call vote at 13:04 · 47% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by EPP
The part voted on: ‘the prevention and reduction of homelessness and building retrofits’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 43 | 0 | 0 | 43 | For |
| Greens | 47 | 0 | 0 | 47 | For |
| S&D | 117 | 0 | 0 | 117 | For |
| Renew | 53 | 11 | 4 | 68 | For |
| EPP | 6 | 144 | 8 | 158 | Against |
| ECR | 2 | 67 | 3 | 72 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 33 | 27 | 60 | Divided |
| ESN | 1 | 18 | 4 | 23 | Against |
| No group | 18 | 5 | 3 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
614 MEPs voted. Open a group, or filter above.
The Left 43 MEPs
Greens 47 MEPs
S&D 117 MEPs
Renew 68 MEPs
EPP 158 MEPs
ECR 72 MEPs
Patriots 60 MEPs
ESN 23 MEPs
No group 26 MEPs
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.