Paragraph 17 — part 1
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026
A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 17/1
Adopted
- For
- 434
- Against
- 173
- Abstained
- 24
roll-call vote at 13:04 · 69% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by EPP
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘the prevention and reduction of homelessness and building retrofits’ and ‘and stresses the importance of monitoring its use during this cycle of the European Semester; calls for measures to combat speculation and regulate short-term rentals in areas under housing stress;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 41 | 0 | 1 | 42 | For |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 120 | 0 | 0 | 120 | For |
| Renew | 50 | 16 | 3 | 69 | For |
| EPP | 159 | 2 | 4 | 165 | For |
| ECR | 0 | 72 | 3 | 75 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 52 | 11 | 63 | Against |
| ESN | 1 | 22 | 2 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 17 | 9 | 0 | 26 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 631 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.